Environmental Issues Assignment | Get Homework Help

Disasters are extremely difficult to deal with on many levels. Creativity may be just as valuable as general comprehension in dealing with many aspects of preparedness. This assignment is designed to assess your overall comprehension of course materials and apply them in a creative, unique way. Choice of one of the following: Option 1. Development of a disaster scenario for a community-wide tabletop exercise. Option 2. Attend a disaster exercise of any size (this can be within a facility or a community) and write a report on the experience summarizing the lessons learned and comparing it to published lessons learned from other exercises. Option 1: Scenario Development (8-13 pages) eReserves Reference: Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2018). Emergency Management Institute IS-120.c Introduction to Exercises. Unit: The tabletop exercise. See web address given previously in the syllabus. I also attached IS139 and the appropriate chapter in the assignment section. Develop a plausible disaster scenario. You may use any of the disasters in Haddow pp 33-75 (any disaster you want to try to tackle is fine for this assignment). This scenario needs to be appropriate for a community-wide tabletop exercise, meaning that it must involve the major responding agencies (e.g. local police, fire, rescue, health departments, hospitals, emergency planners, businesses, state and federal agency officials, volunteer and other community/religious based organizations, or any others you deem pertinent). Many of the required reading assignments and completion of the FEMA on-line courses will be important to ensure your understanding of National Response Framework, ICS, National Incident Management System, and the basics of exercises and exercise evaluation. This project will require you to have a basic understanding of the type of events that could occur in the scenario, combined with some insight into the aftermath we could expect to see associated with that type of disaster Your project will consist of the following components: The paper should be double spaced, use Times New Roman font size 12, pages numbered, and contain a cover page according to APA style (do not count cover page in total pages). 5 points will be deducted for cover page not written in APA style. 1) Background and Assumptions – Summarize the type of event to be used in the scenario and the assumptions you used when developing the scenario. [2 – 3 pages]. Assumptions may include such information as the after effects of an event (the need for mass evacuation following a flood, mass decontamination following a chemical terrorism attack, etc), responding agencies’ roles and activities, etc. 2) Scenario – Summarize, in bullet points or narrative, the “story” of what is taking place. The scenario should be broken into at least two pieces: a) The beginning of the event, and b) The story as the event progresses. It could be broken down into three or more components if you prefer. Remember this is not a novel, but a disaster exercise, so make sure you try and specify some of what should be considered by those participating in the exercise The scenario should include details on: a) The number of patients/victims, b) Facilities affected. You may be as creative as you like, but the scenario must be feasible/possible (based on sound science about the event). [6 – 10 pages] Grading criteria for Option 1/Scenario Development: a) Plausibility (40 points), b) Correct response/progression assumptions (60 points), c) Thoroughness (70 points), d) Logical flow and organization (30 points) Option 2: Exercise Evaluation Report (8-13 pages) Attend a disaster exercise of any size using any type of scenario (any CBRNE agent, emerging infection, or natural disaster) in any location (this can be within a facility or a community) and write an 8 – 13 page report. Use APA style (7th edition) for doing the cover page only. You may use an exercise you have attended in the past 6 months; if it has been longer than 6 months since you attended an exercise you wish to evaluate, you must discuss it with the instructor before starting. Do not submit as your report any documents that were prepared or written by participants or officials of the exercise (i.e. official After Action Reports, etc.). This must be your written evaluation from just what you observed. The paper should be double spaced, use Times New Roman font size 12, pages numbered, and contain a cover page and reference page according to APA style (do not count cover page in total pages). 5 points will be deducted for cover page and reference page not written in APA style. The report will consist of the following components: 1) Background – Summarize the basic points of the exercise, including: •The location •Who and approximately how many people were involved •Basic information on the scenario, such as: -The type of disaster and -Number of victims involved. [2 pages] This should be brief; only provide enough detail to cover the overall scope of the exercis 2) Exercise evaluation – Using the RAND Evaluation criteria for exercises (see Required Readings: Evaluating a Plan and Developing an Exercise –Module 4), evaluate the exercise you attended. [2 – 3 pages] 3) Summary of the lessons learned from the exercise – Summarize (in bullet points or narrative) the lessons learned from this exercise. [2 – 3 pages] 4) Comparison to other exercises – Compare and contrast the lessons learned from the exercise you attended to those published in the literature (you may use references we read for class or other relevant articles). You must compare your experience with at least 3 published articles on lessons learned from other exercises and reference those articles on a reference page according to APA style. [1 – 3 pages] 5) Action steps – Briefly provide an action plan for the facility or community involved in the exercise and how they could/should incorporate the lessons learned into their disaster plan(s). [1 – 2 pages] Grading criteria for Option 2/Exercise Report: a) Points easily identifiable, plausible, and accurate (60 points), b) All ideas flow logically; the comparison argument is identifiable, reasonable, and sound (70 points), c) Thoroughness (30 points), d) Logical flow and organization (30 points), e) References (10 points) Exercise Design – FEMA 139.webarchive