Psychology Assignment | Cheap Essay Services

Discussion 1: Self-Reflection: What I Learned From Interviewing Qualitative interviewing is more than a collection of techniques, technologies, questions and answers. Rubin and Rubin (2012) noted that it has the potential to change the interviewer into a more patient, tolerant, and engaged human being. “It makes you aware of what you haven’t seen before, and it enables you to pull meaningful information out of buzzing confusion” (p. 234). For this Discussion, (TWO-PAGES) you will reflect on your interview experience from last week. Perhaps you have noticed how well (or how poorly) you paid attention; or that something the interviewee said astonished you; or how quickly (or slowly) the time went by. To prepare for this Discussion: Review this week’s Learning Resources related to qualitative interviewing. Consider the phone interview you conducted in Week 7. Consider how this experience is different or similar to a conventional conversation For Discussion #1, due Thursday 07/23, discuss your interviewing experiences – your planning of the interview, the actually interview experience, and your insights as a result of having gone through that experience. Connect this to relevant ‘best practices’ you have learned about in the readings and videos (be sure to cite). Here are the required headings: 1. Who was interviewed (no names) 2. What was Learned 3. What Could be Changed 4. Reflection on Interviews as a Tool Post your REFLECTION and ANALYSIS on what you learned about interviewing. Include in your reflection and analysis: * At least two things you would do differently and why * Something new and surprising that you learned * A reflection about the value of interviewing as a data collection tool Respond to at least one (ONE PAGE) of your colleagues’ posts and provide additional insight you gained from your interviewing. Offer suggestions to your colleagues as to other changes they may want to consider. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Discussion 2: Comparing Data Collection Methods By now, you have experienced and studied a variety of data collection methods from interviews and focus groups to transcripts and ancillary documents. As Ravitch and Carl (2016) explain, “qualitative data collection should be intentional, rigorous, and systematic” (p. 145). But in no way should be bound by rules and procedures as much as related to the lived experiences of the participants. For this Discussion (TWO-PAGES), you will explore different data collection methods and draw comparisons. You also will examine strengths, weaknesses, and the challenges they may present. To prepare for this Discussion: * Review this week’s Learning Resources related to codes and coding. * Consider the similarities and differences in the data collected from your interview and from the transcripts of the Scholars of Change videos. * Consider the other data collection methods you studied (focus groups, reviews of documents and social media; and your own memos and notes). * Review your Major Assignment 1, paying attention to the alignment between your research question and considerations for data collection. * Post a response to the following: From the data you collected and other data collection methods you studied, compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of at least two data collection methods. Include an explanation of your experience using these different data collection methods. Also, include an explanation of what you found difficult or challenging and why. Explain how you as the researcher can ensure that your choices for data collection align with your research questions. Use your experience from Major Assignment 1 as an example. Be sure to support your main post and response post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA style. For Discussion #2, due Friday 07/24, you will explore various content collection processes and discuss why certain choices are more appropriate than others. 1. Here are the required headings: 2. Strengths of Two Methods 3. Weakness of Two methods 4. Experiences and Challenges How to Align RQs to Content Collection Choices (justification) Respond to one (ONE PAGE) of your colleagues’ posts: Who made similar choices to compare and contrast? Explain the similarities or differences in your experience. Explain the clarity of the connection between your colleague’s research question and choice of data collection methods. Is there another method that could be considered? Be sure to provide your rationale