Diversity in Corporate Assignment | Essay Help Services

Detailed info is provided in attachment, please check it and strictly follow the instruction, thxWord Limit: 1,000 words (excluding Reference list)
Submission Format: MS Word document
Include cover page with Name, Student ID, Tutorial day and time.
Font size: 11 or 12 pts at 1.5 spacing
Referencing: Harvard Referencing Style
Submission Method: LMS TurnItIn submission link
Topic:
“When it comes to corporate boards and diversity, the conventional wisdom is simple: Diversity is good. When directors are too alike, the thinking goes, they look at problems – and solutions – the same way. There’s no one to challenge prevailing ideas, or to speak out on issues important to certain groups of customers and employees.
By contrast, diversity leads to more innovation, more outside-the-box thinking and better governance.
Sounds great. And it is, in theory. Unfortunately, few boards that pursue diversity ever see the wished-for returns. Many report no significant change in their performance, while others bog down in conflict and gridlock.”
Jean-Francois Manzoni, Paul Strebel and Jean-Louis Barsoux, (2010), “Why Diversity Can Backfire On Company Boards”, The Wall Street Journal, 25 January 2010.
Discuss whether organisations should pursue diversity considering the challenges it may bring.
Big Ideas in Business
2
Rubric: Your piece of writing will be assessed according to the following rubric.
Exceeded Met Not met Argument and context 4 2 1  There is one clear, well-focused proposition or argument.  Main ideas are clear and are well-supported by detailed and accurate information, correctly cited.  There is one clear, well-focused proposition or argument.  Main ideas are clear but are not well-supported by detailed information or are not correctly cited.  The topic and/or main ideas are not clear.
Critical analysis
4
2
1
 The author demonstrates a detailed understanding of the topic and related sources and the ability to critically appraise and evaluate competing argument and evidence.
 The author demonstrates some understanding of the topic and related sources but limited ability to critically appraise and evaluate competing argument and evidence.
 The author does not demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic and related sources, nor the ability to critically appraise and evaluate competing argument and evidence. Structure 4 2 1  The introduction is inviting, states the main proposition or argument and provides an overview of the paper. The conclusion is strong.  Information is relevant and presented in a logical order.  Uses basic essay structure with an introduction, middle and conclusion.  Ideas do not always flow logically.  Transition is sometimes ineffective.  There is no clear introduction, structure,  Ideas do not flow logically.  Weak transition between paragraphs
Language use
4
2
1
 All sentences are well-constructed and have varied structure and length.
 There are no errors in grammar and/or spelling.
 Vivid use of words and phrases.
 The choice and placement of words seems accurate, natural, and not forced.
 Most sentences are well-constructed, but they have a similar structure and/or length.
 There are several errors in grammar and/or spelling which do not interfere with understanding.
 Words chosen communicate meaning clearly, but the writing lacks variety.
 Sentences sound awkward, are distractingly repetitive, or are difficult to understand.
 There are numerous errors in grammar and/or spelling which interfere with understanding.
 Limited range of vocabulary.
 Jargon or clichés may be present and detract from the meaning. Citations and referencing 4 2 1  All evidence/sources of information are correctly cited.  Include a variety of sources (academic journals, books, reports, etc.) that are relevant, reliable and reputable.  Most evidence/sources of information are correctly cited.  Sources chosen are not always relevant, reliable and reputable.  Citations are missing, incorrect or incomplete.