Digital Health Essay Assignment | Online Homework Help

Assessment 3 Title: Digital Health Essay – Digital Trust
Assessment Due
Assessment Weighting: 30%
Assessment Length: 1000 words (plus, or minus 10%)
Assessment: Individual
Throughout HEA10004 you have explored much that digital health foundations has to offer, from an individual, community and global perspective. Your third and final assignment for this unit requires you to re-examine and discuss a digital health technology you have individually experienced, discussed, reflected upon and/or presented with your colleagues. You are required to prepare these submissions 1 June 2020.
The focus of Assignment 3 is “Digital Trust” (privacy, security and ethics)
Choose to write about ONE technology you have engaged with.
Some examples:
– Internet/website/search engine to search for online health information
– Mobile app to track a healthy eating plan/rehabilitation/mood
– Activity tracker to meet a health or fitness goal
– Social media forum to discuss a health topic
– Digital game to promote your own physical activity
– Your experiences with My Health Record
– Having had a ‘Telehealth’ appointment with a doctor
This essay brings together your learnings over the whole semester. It will help you to think about, approach and appreciate technology’s impact on health and wellbeing. It is designed to give you the opportunity to bring together what you now know about digital health and what you have learnt throughout the semester.
HEA10004 Assessment 3: Digital Health Essay 2 of 8
Structure of your essay:
Using the following sub-headings to layout your final essay will help you.
Cover Page – start with including the standard student declaration cover page
Sub-heading
Description
1. The Health/Wellbeing Context (your introduction)
What was your health or wellbeing challenge?
2. My Goal (argument of the essay)
What was your goal for your health/wellness?
Why and how did you think technology would help you to achieve your goal?
3. My Chosen Digital Health Technology (main idea 1)
What digital health technology did you chose? Why?
Describe this technology– what it is?
How does it work?
How does it help people’s health?
4. How I Engaged with it (main idea 2)
How did you engage with this digital health technology to meet your health goal?
Did it meet your expectations (yes/no)?
Why? (was the outcome positive or negative)?
5. Digital Trust (main idea 3)
If you were to have a discussion with someone else who was thinking of using the same type of technology as part of their health journey, what would they need to consider from a digital trust perspective?
How would you advise them? (what does the literature say about positive or negative outcomes?
Quality? is it safe?
What are the privacy/security/confidentiality considerations?
Are there any ethical issues to be aware of? (cultures, vulnerable populations, research)
6. Conclusion
The conclusion brings together all the main points of the essay
7. References
Your essay should incorporate research, be sure to give credit to each source using in-text citations and a references page (APA 6th style Format)
Using the sub-headings and descriptions above as your guide, Assignment 3 requires you to think about how digital health is used, can or cannot be used, in the real-world. You need to think critically about your experiences and what you have learned through this semester. Your assignment should be supported by correctly citing and referencing literature you have read (APA 6th style). ‘Critical thinking seeks to identify reliable information and make reliable judgements. It encompasses mindset and skills, both of which can be developed through an understanding of key concepts, practice and application’.
HEA10004 Assessment 3: Digital Health Essay 3 of 8
Your ability to identify, analyse, reflect, evaluate and reason on the good and bad of different aspects of digital health – critically assess technology for health is an important skill. It will help to ensure that the future of digital health is evidence-based, no matter what you choose to study and career to pursue.
You will need to cite and reference all sources throughout your essay; demonstrating that you were informed by the literature and you collected relevant evidence to support (or, disprove) your experiences. Plagiarism, cut and paste, and paraphrasing is not be tolerated. Nor, will re-using any work you have submitted for previous assignments (As a general rule, approximately 1 reference per 100 words is expected).
This assessment is completed in two parts.
• Peer Review Feedback (ungraded)- In Week 10 tutorial
We are strong advocates for providing feedback ‘as-you-go’ opportunities for students to improve their understanding and skills. We are also a strong advocate for giving students the opportunity to review and feedback each other’s work. This is a skill our students will take with them into their future careers and work practices. In this assignment we have combined both opportunities. As outlined above, in your Week 10 tutorial, you will be asked to read, discuss and provide feedback on the work of at least one peer and you will receive similar feedback.
For the week 10 tutorial, you should bring along an outline plan for your essay, the ‘story’ that you would like to tell about your experiences using the particular technology for health/wellness activity, or healthcare. Your outline should short, no more than 100-150 words in length, preferably in the form of dot points. You should cover what you intend to expand on in your final submission. Aim for no more than 5-6 key dot points. For example
o The Health/Wellbeing Context ….
o My Goal is …..
o My Chosen Digital Health Technology is….
o How I Engaged with it is/was….
o Digital Trust ….. ….. ….. ……
• You will share your dot points with a peer in your Week 10 tutorial, discuss each other’s ideas and provide each other with useful feedback to ultimately inform/improve your final essay.
• Final Essay Submission (graded): 1 June by 11.59pm AEST
HEA10004 Assessment 3: Digital Health Essay 4 of 8
Submission Requirements
• Your essay must be submitted via the Canvas unit site through the ‘Assignments’ tab (Assignment 3) – Turnitin will be used to check for plagiarism
o You must include a cover page (see text below from the standard student declaration), including the sentence “I declare that in submitting all work for this assessment I have read, understood and agree to the content and expectations of the assessment declaration”.
• The essay should be in one single Microsoft Word document and should be written in 12 point font size and should use 1.15 line spacing between each line
• Word count does not include cover page, reference list, any appendices, and tables or figures (if any).
• Penalties may be applied for significantly exceeding the word limit – words significantly beyond the limit will not receive marks.
o The standard procedure is that essays will be marked up to the specified word count only.
• The essay is worth 30% of your final HEA10004 mark.
• Late Penalty: 10% per day. Submissions more than 5 days late will receive zero marks
• Do not email the assessment to either the unit convenor or tutor.
• Keep a backup of your submission. If your essay goes astray, for whatever reason, you will be required to reproduce it.
• Pages of the assessment should have footers which include your name, student ID, unit code, assessment title and page numbers.
• It is expected that all work submitted, will have been edited for spelling, grammar and clarity.
Referencing
The submission must be in APA 6th style.
https://www.swinburne.edu.au/library/referencing/
(as a general rule, approximately 1 reference per 100 words is expected)
Assignment 3 Cover Sheet: Student Declaration
I declare that:
• This assessment does not contain any material that has previously been submitted for assessment at this or any other university, except where authorised by the convenor concerned and where acknowledgement is made in the text;
• I alone have produced this original piece of work and no part has been completed by any other student.
• I have read and understood the avoiding plagiarism guidelines and no part of this work has been copied or paraphrased from any other source except where this has been clearly acknowledged in the body of the assessment and included in the reference list.
• I have retained a copy of this assessment that can be produced in the event of it becoming lost or damaged.
HEA10004 Assessment 3: Digital Health Essay 5 of 8
Signature
Marking Criteria
The rubric at the end of this document will be used to assess your work.
Extensions and Late Submission
Please reread the section on extensions and late submission in the Unit Outline.
Plagiarism
Please reread the section on plagiarism in the Unit Outline.
Assessment Help
If you have any queries or concerns you may discuss them with the convenor and/or tutor via the Canvas discussion board in the appropriate discussion forum or if of a personal nature by email.
Technical Help
Technical assistance can be obtained from the Swinburne Service Desk: servicedesk@swin.edu.au or (03) 9214 5000.
HEA10004 Assessment 3: Digital Health Essay 6 of 8
Marking Criteria Rubric – Digital Trust Essay (30% of overall grade)
Achievement/ Criteria
Fail (NN) <50%
Pass (PP) 50-59%
Credit (CR) 60-69%
Distinction (DN) 70-79%
High Distinction (HD) 80-100%
Health Context and Goal
How well are these identified and described in the context of technology?
(20 marks)
Context not identified. Unsatisfactory.
Little or no identification of a goal
Basic context identification
a goal provided
Good context provided
Clear identification of a goal
Makes a reasonable attempt to elaborate and link health context and goal
Description of why technology was considered to support the goal is under-developed
Solid in-depth context provided
Solid identification of a goal provided
Link between the two is very well described
Solid description of why technology was considered to support the goal
Excellent context provided
Solid identification of a goal provided
Critical discussion of health context and goal
Critical argument for why technology was considered
Highlights various perspectives and factors that impacted decision-making
The Technology
and Engagement
Description of the chosen technology and how it was engaged with
(20 marks)
Unsatisfactory description of the chosen technology
Basic description of the chosen technology
Little discussion of how it was engaged with to achieve the health goal
Good description of the chosen technology
Good discussion of how it was engaged with to achieve the health goal
Solid description of the chosen technology
Solid discussion of it was engaged with to achieve the health goal
Provides a clear linkage between the technology used and the outcome
Excellent description of the chosen technology
Excellent discussion of how it was engaged with to achieve the health goal
Provides clear linkage between the technology used and the outcome;
HEA10004 Assessment 3: Digital Health Essay 7 of 8
Shows critical appreciation of technology use by demonstrating varying viewpoints and considerations
Digital Trust
Demonstrates critical thinking (identifies, analyses, reflects, evaluates and reasons) rregarding several digital trust related issues related to the topic
(35 marks)
Unsatisfactory Demonstrates lack of critical thinking regarding digital trust related factors.
Little or no identification of digital trust factors
Basic demonstration of critical thinking regarding digital trust related factors.
Basic identification of some digital trust factors
Good demonstration of critical thinking regarding digital trust related factors.
Good demonstration and appreciation of several factors, including ethics, privacy, security, and evidence of impact
Complete demonstration of critical thinking regarding digital trust related factors.
Deep appreciation of all factors, including:
ethics, privacy, security, and evidence of impact
by linking them back to context being discussed
Complete demonstration of critical thinking regarding digital trust related factors.
In-depth appreciation of all factors, including:
ethics, privacy, security, and evidence of impact;
Presents a critical argument for and against digital trust factors
Evidence
(citation and references)
Ability to source and use evidence appropriately
(10 marks)
Unsatisfactory references/supporting sources not provided
Basic use of referencing/supporting sources (less than 5)
Numerous errors or omissions in citations and referencing
Good use of referencing/supporting sources (less than 7);
Some errors or omissions in citations and referencing
Solid use of referencing/supporting sources (less than 10);
Minimal errors or omissions in citations and referencing
Excellent use of references/supporting sources (between 10-15)
Sources are from very credible sources relevant to the topic;
Referencing is strong and free of errors/omissions
Writing
(quality and clarity)
Unsatisfactory writing
Basic writing
Good writing
Some grammar, punctuation, spelling, and formatting errors.
Solid writing
Excellent writing
Skilfully written, logical flow; presents
HEA10004 Assessment 3: Digital Health Essay 8 of 8
Ability to communicate clearly in writing
(10 marks)
Significant grammar, punctuation, spelling, and formatting errors
Numerous grammar, punctuation, spelling, and formatting errors.
Minimal grammar, punctuation, spelling, and formatting errors.
a well-constructed post; Excellent grammar, and sentence structure.
Online engagement and participation throughout the 12 week unit
(5 marks)
Unsatisfactory
No engagement and participation
Basic engagement and participation (1-3 interactions)
Attended few tutorials
Little contribution to Peer Led-Discussion boards
Some engagement and participation (3-5 interactions)
Attended some tutorials
Some meaningful contribution to Peer Led-Discussion boards
Good engagement and participation (6-8)
Attended most tutorials
Meaningful contribution to Peer Led-Discussion boards
Excellent engagement and participation (8 or more)
Attended all tutorials
Excellent, Meaningful and supportive contribution to Peer Led-Discussion boards