why collegage atheltes should be paid money to play college sports Persuasive Essay Assignment | College Homework Help
Persuasive Essay Grading Rubric English 11 Name:
|
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
why collegage atheltes should be paid money to play college sports Persuasive Essay Assignment | College Homework Help
Get an essay WRITTEN FOR YOU, Plagiarism free, and by an EXPERT!
Experimenting |
Emerging |
Developing |
Effective |
Strong |
|
| Ideas
(Introduction) 10 Pts |
*Little, if any, clear details given
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
*Topic is unclear
*Lack of background info.
6 |
*States topic / not engaging
*Some background info. *Lacks ATG
7 |
*Engaging
*ATG is present *History and background given
8 9 |
*Effective, engaging
*Powerful ATG *Strong history/background
10 |
| Organization
(Introduction) 5 Pts |
*No clear thesis and main point preview
0 1 |
*Inclusion of thesis
*Main point preview is unclear
2 |
*Inclusion of thesis
*Main point preview is somewhat clear 3 |
*Inclusion of thesis and main point preview
4 |
*Strong thesis and main point preview
5 |
| Ideas
(Body) 25 Pts
|
*Fewer than 3 sources used
* Thesis is not supported by research *No evaluation/synthesis
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 |
*Fewer than 4 sources used
* Thesis needs more support from sources *Little evaluation and synthesis of research is shown
13 14 15 16 17 |
*Fewer than 5 sources used
*Thesis needs more support from sources *More evaluation and synthesis of research is needed
18 19 20 21 |
*5 sources are cited
*Thesis supported with quotes, statistics, and paraphrasing from multiple media forms *Even more evaluation and synthesis of research is needed
22 23 |
*5 sources are cited (one seminal text)
*Thesis supported with extensive statistics, quotes, and paraphrases from multiple media forms *Strong evaluation / synthesis 24 25 |
| Organization
(Body) 25 Pts |
* No transition between sentences and body
*No topic sentences in body paragraphs
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 |
*Transitions and topic sentences are missing
*Paragraphs are too long / they need to be separated into shorter, more focused ones
13 14 15 16 17 |
*Transitions and topic sentences are missing from some paragraphs
*Inconsistent focus
18 19 20 21 |
*Transitions are used between most sentences and paragraphs
*A topic sentence begins each body paragraph *TS lacks transition *Effective sequence of ideas 22 23 |
*Transitions are used between sentences and paragraphs
*Each topic sentence shows the main idea (or topic) of its respective paragraph *Effective sequence of ideas 24 25 |
| Organization &
Ideas (Conclusion) 15 Pts |
*Unclear, if any, conclusion is given
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
*Does not restate the thesis
*Does not sum up the main points of the paper
7 8 9 |
*Repeats the thesis
*Sums up the main points of the paper, but has a flat ending
10 11
|
*Sums up the main points of the paper pretty well
*Restates the thesis
12 13 |
*Sums up the main points nicely
*Restates the thesis effectively *Raises a call to action, or a statement of significance
14 15 |
| Voice
10 Pts |
*Lacks formal tone / style
*First or second person dominates the POV
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
*Lacks formal tone and style
*First or second person is found multiple times
6 7 |
*Formal tone and style
*Some appearance of first or second person is found
8 |
*Maintains formal and objective tone and style most of the time
*Third person point of view
9 |
*Maintains formal / objective tone / style throughout
*Third person point of view
10 |
| Word Choice
10 Pts |
*Weak verbs and few describing words
*Unclear paraphrasing *Unclear / misused words making it hard to understand 0 1 2 3 4 5 |
*Weak verbs and few describing words
*Unclear paraphrasing *Unclear or misused word choice 6 7 |
*Adequate verb choices and describing words
*Adequate paraphrasing *Unclear or misused word c 8 |
*Effective verb choices and describing words
*Effective paraphrasing *Limited use of “to be” verbs *Appropriate word choice 9 |
*Strong verb choices and vivid describing words
*Astute paraphrasing *Limited use of “to be” verbs *Artful word choice 10 |
| Sentence Fluency
10 Pts |
*Sentences are difficult to understand because of sentence structure or awkward wording
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
*Mainly simple sentences
*Awkward wording confuses reader
6 |
*Little sentence variety (compound, complex, compound-complex)
*Awkward wording in multiple places
7 |
*Some different of sentences that flow easily (compound, complex, compound-complex)
*Varied sentence beginnings *Some awkward wording
8 9 |
*Wide sentence variety that flows easily (compound, complex, compound-complex)
*Varied sentence beginnings *No awkward wording
10 |
| Conventions
(Grammar and mechanics) 10 Pts |
*Spelling errors impede readability
*Many grammar errors *Fragments and run-on sentences are present
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
*Spelling errors on easy words
*Errors on basic punctuation and capitalization *Run-on sentences/fragments
6 |
*Spelling generally correct on basic words
*Grammar errors infrequent *Consistent paragraphing *Some punctuation errors
7 8
|
*Consistent use of punctuation and capitalization
*Few paragraphing mistakes with dialogue/quotations *Few spelling/homophone errors
9 |
*Spelling correct even on more difficult words
*Accurate and creative use of punctuation *Correct grammar and usage
10 |
| MLA Format and Citation
5 Pts |
*Lacks MLA formatting
*Many citation formatting mistakes *Plagiarism is found—see below!
0 1 |
*MLA style: heading, page number…with many errors
*MLA formatting of in-text citations, but multiple errors
2 |
*MLA style: heading, page numbers…with some errors
*MLA formatting of in-text citations with some errors
3 |
*MLA style: heading, page numbers…with some errors
*MLA formatting of in-text citations with some errors
4 |
*Perfect MLA style: heading, page numbers…
*Perfect MLA formatting of in-text citation with avoidance of plagiarism
5 |
Deductions for plagiarism instances:
Strengths:
Items to Improve:
Total Score:_______/125
Persuasive Essay
Name __________________________________
Hour _____ Date: _____/_____/_____ SCORE: __________ / 125 points
Assignment: Use the writing process to compose a well-developed, typed essay that clearly persuades your audience to support a position and/or take action. Your topic may cover any issue that has two sides. Pick something of interest that not everyone is going to agree with.
Ideas and Content:
- Appropriate, sufficiently narrowed topic that is arguable
- Effective, attention-getting introduction
- Clear thesis statement that has a clear focus and purpose
- Clear and appropriate discussion of history and background of topic that gives essay a clear context
- Opposing claims may be acknowledged and clearly managed
- Specific examples that clearly support the thesis
- Vivid, specific details clearly illustrate your claims
- Thorough synthesis of information from multiple sources
- Credible and relevant sources from multiple forms of media
- Persuasive arguments that avoid logical fallacies
- Effective conclusion
Organization:
- Clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion that are easy to follow and make sense
- Effective sequence of claims, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence
- Effective topic sentences and concluding sentences
- Effective transitions in each paragraph
Voice:
- Formal style and objective tone
- Third person point of view
Word Choice:
- Strong verb choices and vivid describing words
- Effective paraphrases and summaries that avoid plagiarism
- Limited use of “to be” verbs
- Appropriate word choice in context
- Avoid contractions (use “do not” rather than “don’t”)
Sentence Fluency:
- Different kinds of sentences (simple, compound, complex, & compound-complex) that flow easily
- Varied sentence beginnings
- Awkward wording is avoided
Conventions:
- Few, if any, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, and paragraphing errors
- All words are spelled correctly
- Correct parallel structure when appropriate
- Accurate MLA formatting of in-text citations and Works Cited page
Format:
- Accurate MLA style (title, page numbers, margins, double spacing, font size)
- Interesting, attention-getting title that hints at subject of essay
Unicheck Plagiarism Tool: You will have a chance to see your plagiarism results, make corrections, and re-submit. Points may be deducted for anything higher than 5%.
