Police Brutality Social Problem American Policing Article Media Reflection In your Media Reflection papers, you must find a news article (written, not a vi

Police Brutality Social Problem American Policing Article Media Reflection In your Media Reflection papers, you must find a news article (written, not a video. Although if a video accompanies a written article that is okay) that relates to one of the social problems we have discussed( Use police brutality please). You must use at least one scholarly source from the course in your media reflection paper. Your job in these papers is to: Identify the social problem the news article is about Identify how the news article is framing the social problem.Present an argument about whether you agree or disagree with this framing and why- based on the scholarly reading(s) of your choice from that week. The scholarly readings are pasted below for police brutality, you dont have to use all, just somehttps://plsonline.eku.edu/insidelook/brief-history-slavery-and-origins-american-policinghttps://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2014/12/chicago-police-torture-jon-burge/383839/https://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/caps-cpd-community-policing-analysis/Content?oid=23635982https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/To be clear, your argument cannot simply involve you saying that you like or dislike what the article is saying. You need to provide support for your claims based on the scholarly research you are reading. ‘RUBRIC FOR ASSIGNMENT IS IN FILES BELOW Criteria
Needs Revision
Novice
Proficient
Identifies the social problem without
clearly explanation of how the issue
is socially constructed and only
offers some supportive argument.
Only provides a description on how
the article frames is socially
constructed and identifies the
systems of inequality that bias the
framing. Lack sociological evidence to
support for each claim.
Discussion clearly identifies the
author’s stance on the article. Uses
some sociological vocabulary to
support their argument. Does not
fully draw connections between their
arguments and the evidence.
Clearly indicates how the issue is a
social problem and provides clear and
substantial sociological evidence to
support claims.
Provides ample evidence on how the
article frame is socially constructed and
identifies the systems of inequality that
bias the framing. Provides sociological
evidence to support for each claim.
States the purpose of the article but
is not clear or relevant to the content
of the source material. The “voice”
used in the paper does not convey a
clear line of thought that ties the key
points consistently to the basis of the
argument.
States the purpose of the article and
links the source material to the
purpose of the argument. The
“voice” used in the paper conveys a
clear line of thought that ties the key
points consistently to the basis of the
argument (e.g., comes across as
professional and informed).
Very clearly states the purpose of the
article and the writer’s stance.
Exceptional argument(s) that tie(s) in the
key points of the source material for the
paper. Uses a strong “voice” to convey
the ideas and argument.
Some grammar and spelling issues.
Only one or two grammar and
spelling issues
Uses outside and in-class sources but
does not cite correctly or link to
example.
No grammar or spelling issues
Identify Social
Problem
No indication of social
problem
Only describes the news article
without a clear connection to why
the issue at stake is a social problem.
Identify how news
article frames the
social problem
No indication of how the
article frames the social
problem
Argument (Use of
Evidence): Agree/
Disagree
Discussion is pure opinion
and is not grounded in
sociological analysis and
does not provide
supportive evidence to
back claims.
Only provides a basic description on
how the article frames the social
problem at hand. Does not explain
how the frame is socially constructed
and does not identify systems of
inequality that may bias the framing.
Discussion includes some opinions
which are not grounded in
sociological analysis. Provides some
basis of a sociological argument but
does not provide ample evidence to
back claims.
Structure and
Strength of
Argument
Grammar
Use of Sources
The “voice” used in the
assignment does not
convey a clear line of
thought that ties the key
points consistently to the
basis of the argument
(e.g., comes across as
“unprofessional” and
opinionated).
Multiple grammar and
spelling issues
Uses no sources to
support the argument/s
Uses some outside and in-class
sources but does not cite correctly,
analyze the citation, or link to the
example provided. (No in-text
citations)
ROCK STAR STATUS!
Clearly identifies the author’s stance on
the article. Uses sociological vocabulary
and analysis to support their argument.
Makes clear connections between their
arguments and the evidence.
Uses outside and in-class sources, with
correct citations that both link to the
example and analyzes how they apply.
(Has in-text citations and a work cited
page)
/20
/20
/25
/15
/10
/10

Purchase answer to see full
attachment