NRS490 Grand Canyon University Breast Cancer Project Change Proposal In this assignment, students will pull together the change proposal project components

NRS490 Grand Canyon University Breast Cancer Project Change Proposal In this assignment, students will pull together the change proposal project components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. At the conclusion of this project, the student will be able to apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.

Students will develop a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

Background
Problem statement
Purpose of the change proposal
PICOT
Literature search strategy employed
Evaluation of the literature
Applicable change or nursing theory utilized
Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures
Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome
Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Statement Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use the feedback to make appropriate revisions to the portfolio components before submitting.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Course Code
NRS-490
Class Code
NRS-490-O501
Criteria
Content
Percentage
60.0%
Background
5.0%
Problem Statement
5.0%
Change Proposal Purpose
5.0%
PICOT
5.0%
Literature Search Strategy
5.0%
Literature Evaluation
5.0%
Utilization of Change or Nursing Theory (2.2)
5.0%
Proposed Implementation Plan with Outcome
Measures (3.2)
5.0%
Identification of potential barriers to plan
implementation, and a discussion of how these
could be overcome (2.3)
5.0%
Appendices Inclusive of Practice Immersion
Clinical Documentation (1.2)
5.0%
Evidence of Revision
10.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
30.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
10.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
10.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
10.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal
Unsatisfactory
0-71% (0.00%)
Background section is not present.
Problem statement is not present.
Purpose of change proposal is not present.
PICOT is not present.
Literature search strategy is not present.
Literature evaluation is not present.
Theory utilization is not present.
Implementation plan is not present.
Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation
and /or discussion component is not present.
Appendices are not present.
Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback
or evidence of revision on research critiques.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
300.0
Less Than Satisfactory
72-75% (75.00%)
Background section is present, but incomplete or otherwise
lacking in required detail.
Problem statement is present, but incomplete or otherwise
lacking in required detail.
Purpose of change proposal is present, but incomplete or
otherwise lacking in required detail.
PICOT is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in
required detail.
Literature search strategy is present, but incomplete or
otherwise lacking in required detail.
Literature evaluation is present, but incomplete or otherwise
lacking in required detail.
Theory utilization content is present, but incomplete or
otherwise lacking in required detail.
Implementation plan is present, but incomplete or otherwise
lacking in required detail.
Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation
with a discussion component is present, but is incomplete or
otherwise lacking in required detail.
Appendices are present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking
in required detail.
Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of
revision is incomplete.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory
76-79% (79.00%)
Background section is present. Some minor details or
elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede
understanding.
Problem statement is present. Some minor details or
elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede
understanding.
Purpose of change proposal is present. Some minor details or
elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede
understanding.
PICOT is present. Some minor details or elements are missing
but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.
Literature search strategy is present. Some minor details or
elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede
understanding.
Literature evaluation is present. Some minor details or
elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede
understanding.
Theory utilization content is present. Some minor details or
elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede
understanding.
Implementation plan is present. Some minor details or
elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede
understanding.
Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation
with a discussion component is present. Some minor details
or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede
understanding.
Appendices are present with minor elements missing that do
not impede understanding.
Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of
revision are present.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good
80-89% (89.00%)
Background section is present and complete. The submission
provides the basic information required.
Problem statement is present and complete. The submission
provides the basic information required.
Purpose of change proposal is present and complete. The
submission provides the basic information required.
PICOT is present and complete. The submission provides the
basic information required.
Literature search strategy is present and complete. The
submission provides the basic information required.
Literature evaluation is present and complete. The
submission provides the basic information required.
Theory utilization content is present and complete. The
submission provides the basic information required.
Implementation plan is present and complete. The
submission provides the basic information required.
Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation
with a discussion component is present and complete. The
submission provides the basic information required.
Appendices are present and complete. The submission
provides the basic information required.
Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and
revision is clearly provided.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent
90-100% (100.00%)
Background section is present, complete, and incorporates
additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the
reader.
Problem statement is present, complete, and incorporates
additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the
reader.
Purpose of change proposal is present, complete, and
incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking
to engage the reader.
PICOT is present, complete, and incorporates additional
relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
Literature search strategy is present, complete, and
incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking
to engage the reader.
Literature evaluation is present, complete, and incorporates
additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the
reader.
Comments
Theory utilization content is present, complete, and
incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking
to engage the reader.
Implementation plan is present, complete, and incorporates
additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the
reader.
Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation
with a discussion component is present, complete, and
incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking
to engage the reader.
Appendices are present, complete, and incorporates
additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the
reader.
Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and
revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in
a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment