University of California 1984 v Our Society Today Compare & Contrast Paper here is the requirements: “1984” Compare & Contrast Paper—(Due date in the abov

University of California 1984 v Our Society Today Compare & Contrast Paper here is the requirements:

“1984” Compare & Contrast Paper—(Due date in the above table.)

At the beginning of the class session noted in the previous table, submit a “compare and contrast” analysis of the ethical concepts revealed in the society described in “1984” versus our society today. How many of the factors in Orwell’s vision have come true—wholly or in part?Given what you have learned/studied in this class regarding the ethics of individual privacy vis-à-vis technological advancements, demonstrate how you would use the 7-step Decision Model to determine ethical choices in your and society’s real future.

(Content of the papers will be no more than eight, double-spaced, double-sided, stapled pages. A cover page is optional.A citations-of-information-sources page should be at the end.Cover and sources pages do not count in page total.“Style” is “business efficient”, i.e., prose is acceptable, along with bullet points, checklists, tables or whatever structure clearly, efficiently communicates to the reader.)

the attach files is the text book and the 7 steps decision model that might helps you to complete the essay. please let me know if you have any questions Step 1: Determine the Facts
I recommend presenting these facts concisely in point form
Step 2: Ethical Issues
Please make sure you use of AT LEAST 3 ethical vectors (‘Right vs Wrong, Fair vs Unfair, Good vs
Bad, Just v Unjust, etc.’ – Professor Campbell showed you a list of these vectors during the first
class)
Step 3: Stakeholders
●
Identify AT LEAST 5 stakeholders (give me 1 or 2 points on how they might stand to gain
or lose from the issue)
○ My recommendation: present stakeholders in a table form with 2 columns
■
Stakeholder
How they might be affected
ABC
+/-
●
State your bias: You can draw the bias regarding how you feel about the issue due to your
own moral compass etc.
Step 4: Delineate (and/or Create) Alternative Courses of Action
●
●
●
2 different ALTERNATIVE courses of action:
My recommendation: Do something, or do nothing
PLUS, 1 more ‘Wild’ scenario; label it as ‘Wild’ Scenario:
NOTE: ‘wild’ scenario, in this case, is a scenario that is ‘out of the box’
ALTERNATIVE course of action.
EXTRA NOTE: Do not provide what actually happened as it is not an ALTERNATIVE
course of action.
Step 5: Assess how Alternatives Affect Stakeholders
●
●
●
Evaluate your 2 ALTERNATIVE courses of action and follow what is said in the decision
model
If you want, go ahead and assess the ‘wild’ scenario (if you can, and if time allows)
AND declare your ‘conflict of interest’
Step 6: Guidance Sources
●
●
You do not have to reach out to these people to ask for guidance
Think of yourself as the CEO of the company that you are describing: who would you seek
help from?
Here are some examples:
●
●
●
Industry experts, this could mean business consultants, public relations firms, etc.
In addition, please also state “WHY” you are asking these parties
NOTE: You do not have to give me “what they would say”
Step 7: Make a Decision; Monitor the Outcome
●
Either:
○ Make a decision based on one of your alternative courses of action (or two or
more)
○ OR talk about what happened in real life and why it is working or not; elaborate
Also, please note:
●
Always remember to cite your sources. Business Efficient style is ALSO treated with
“academic” standards; size 12 font, 1-inch margin, proper citations

Purchase answer to see full
attachment