Colorado State University Global Human Resource Training Presentation You are an executive at the Society for Human Resource Management. A large national c
Colorado State University Global Human Resource Training Presentation You are an executive at the Society for Human Resource Management. A large national corporate software company has decided to open a manufacturing facility in China. The organization has conducted preliminary research and realizes they have many issues to managing human resources in the international realm, and they have decided to hire SHRM to put together a training session for their human resource team.
Your assignment is to create a PowerPoint presentation to help educate the firm’s human resource professionals on how best to perform their duties as human resource managers in another country. In that capacity, address the following questions in the PowerPoint presentation. Remember to put the discussion in context so that it relates to the manufacturing industry.
Globalization and Your Organization: Discuss how globalization has impacted the manufacturing industry. Specifically, explain why it is likely that a manufacturing-based company would benefit from entering/expanding into a new market.
Cultural Differences: As we have learned throughout this course, cultural differences are one of the major challenges facing international human resource professionals. Provide an in-depth discussion of the various cultural challenges, both domestic and foreign, that HR will encounter. Ensure that you address this question in regard to opening a location in China in the manufacturing industry. Then describe how these challenges will be faced and overcome. Make sure to provide specific examples that are relevant to China and the manufacturing industry.
Management Strategy: Based on what you have learned throughout the course, discuss how you would manage employees from China differently than those in the domestic country (e.g., the United States). Additionally, explain how technological innovations would allow you to more effectively manage the workforce. Importantly, you should propose 3 to 4 specific strategies that an international human resource manager should adopt to better manage employees working in China.
Tools: Finally, select 2 to 3 tools or strategies that you learned about in this class (i.e., compensation, evaluations, etc.) that will assist you in better managing human resources in the international arena. Specifically explain how those tools can allow a human resource professional to better perform their responsibilities.
Your presentation should be 14-18 slides in length and conform to CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.). Include at least 3-4 sentences of speaker’s notes per slide. For PowerPoint, these can be in the notes section. For other presentation programs (Prezi, Google Slides, or similar program), they can be submitted separately. Include at least 10 scholarly references in addition to the course textbook. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these references.
Rubric
HRM470 Mod 8 PP (1)
HRM470 Mod 8 PP (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
30.0 to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectation
The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
24.0 to >18.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
18.0 to >12.0 pts
Below Expectation
The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
12.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
40.0 to >32.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of XXX; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
32.0 to >24.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
24.0 to >16.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
16.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
25.0 to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
20.0 to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
15.0 to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
10.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in strategic planning recommendations.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Cites and integrates at least XX credible sources.
12.0 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Cites and integrates XX credible sources.
9.0 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Cites and integrates XX credible source.
6.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Cites and integrates no credible sources.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Source Material
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.
12.0 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
9.0 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
6.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.
