Florida National University Nursing Role and Scope Paper After reading Chapter 7 and reviewing the lecture power point (located in lectures tab), please an

Florida National University Nursing Role and Scope Paper After reading Chapter 7 and reviewing the lecture power point (located in lectures tab), please answer the following questions. Each question must have at least 3 paragraphs and you must use at 3 least references (APA) included in your main post.

1. Do you view nursing as a career or a job? What are your professional goals related to nursing?

2. Describe the steps you would take to prepare yourself to interview for your ideal future Nursing role?

PowerPoint Link:

https://learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-xythos.s3.amazonaws.com/5df44c85137e1/1804833?response-cache-control=private%2C%20max-age%3D21600&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27Chapter%2520No.%25207.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20200617T000000Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=21600&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAZH6WM4PLTYPZRQMY%2F20200617%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=93bf001741e21593ae891357c6c16acfa43d5ab938524c3570f710986148122c

Please make sure to follow the instructions as given and use either spell-check or Grammarly before you post your assignment, and be careful of plagiarism. 3rd case studies can be on any case from any chapter including chapter 7 or
any case between chapter 7 and the end of the Tavani book. Scan through
the book and pick a case that interests you. You will need to apply 3 standard
Ethical principles, 3 items from the code of ethics, and 3 items from the 5
Rules for computing artifacts. I will send a list of the cases you can analyze.
As you can see There is a structure to the details added to each case study.
3rd Case Study assignment
Pick a case or subject from the list of case studies I have sent you.
Steps in Ethical Case Analysis
1. Get the facts straight. Review the case. Briefly recap the details of the case at the
beginning of your paper.
2. Identify the central stakeholders in the case. Identify 6 stakeholders then narrow
your analysis down to 3.
3. Identify the technical/professional problem in the case.
4. Identify the Ethical problem or problems in the case.
5. Solve the technical and ethical problems using both technical and Ethical
standards. Analyze the case from 3 perspectives, 1st use standard ethical
principles and use 1 ethical principle for each perspective. 2nd, you must now
also apply 3 principles from the ACM/IEEE codes list of principles (p. 92) in
your analysis. 1 principle should be applied for each of the 3 stakeholder
perspectives you analyze. 3rd you need to apply 3 of the 5 rules for computing
artifacts. This should be an Anticipatory Ethical analysis. 1 rule should be
applied for each of the 3 stakeholder perspectives you picked in step 2. The 5
rules are located in a file in Blackboard.
6. Will your solution to the problem withstand criticism from the perspectives of both
a variety of Ethical principles and Professionals in your field?
7. What recommendations can you make about the problems in the case based upon
your ethical analysis?
When you construct your analysis be sure and remember that we are assigning a 4-6
page analysis. With this length limitation it is important to realize that you will
probably only be able to look at the problems in the case from three stakeholder
perspectives. If you try to analyze every stakeholder perspective you will probably
exceed the length limitation.
Grading and Evaluation of Individual Papers
1. What are the objectives of the papers?
A.
i. To become sensitized to the ethical issues in Engineering and Information
Technology.
ii. Learn how to analyze a case.
iii. Learn how to identify the major stakeholders in a case.
iv. Learn how to identify the technical problems in a case.
v. Learn how to identify the ethical problems in a case.
vi. Learn how to apply ethical principles to a case.
vii. Learn how to make recommendations in a case based upon ethical analysis.
B.
a. Critical thinking
i. Did you identify and focus on the crucial material and facts in the case?
ii. Did you support claims you make about the case with facts?
iii. Did you think about the case from a variety of stakeholder perspectives?
b. Ethical analysis
i. Did you identify the central Ethical problem(s)
ii. Did you conduct a well thought out ethical analysis by applying 3 ethical
principles?
iii. Did you justify ethical judgments with accurate facts and ethical principles?
iv. Did you think about the case from a variety of ethical perspectives?
v. Did you base your analysis upon ethical principles that cannot be easily
criticized?
How will your papers be assessed?
Evaluations of Papers (Percentages)
A. The Case Recap (.10)
i. Do you highlight the key points in the case?
a. Are the facts in the case accurate?
b. Did you focus on the crucial aspects of the case?
c. Did you avoid including non essential or superfluous information?
B. Stakeholders (.10)
i. Who are the primary and secondary stakeholders in the case?
ii. Did you clearly identify from which stakeholder perspective you are analyzing the
material in the case?
a. From whose perspective are you analyzing the case?
C. What is the central technical problem? (.15)
i.. How is the central technical problem related to the ethical problems in the case?
D. What is/are the ethical problem/problems? (.15)
i. What ethical problems do you see in the case?
ii. What is the central ethical problem?
iii. Why is this the central ethical problem?
E. What ethical principles apply to the central ethical problem? (.10)
i. Do you correctly define the ethical principles you use?
ii. Have you correctly applied the ethical principles you use?
iii. Do the principles you use withstand obvious criticisms from other ethical
perspectives?
F. What principles from ACM/IEEE codes apply to the central ethical problem?
(.10)
i. Do you correctly define the ethical principles you use?
ii. Have you correctly applied the ethical principles you use?
iii. Do the principles you use withstand obvious criticisms from other ethical
perspectives?
.
G. What rules from The 5 Rules apply to the central ethical problem? (.10)
i. Do you correctly define the ethical principles you use?
ii. Have you correctly applied the ethical principles you use?
iii. Do the principles you use withstand obvious criticisms from other ethical
perspectives?
H. What are your recommendations? (.20)
i. Are your recommendations based upon your ethical analysis?
ii. Do your recommendations link to your ethical analysis?
iii. Rather than stating the obvious ( e. g. this problem could have been easily solved if
… ) what do you recommend for similar cases in the future?

Purchase answer to see full
attachment