NURS 6208 GWU Loss Intervention for Young Adults Using Mobile Technology Hello,I am needing assistance with this power point. I have attached the article,

NURS 6208 GWU Loss Intervention for Young Adults Using Mobile Technology Hello,I am needing assistance with this power point. I have attached the article, and the grading criteria. Please follow the requirements that are stated. This is a graduate level course. If you have any questions please reach out to me. Thank You. NURS 6208 Informatics
Article Review/Critique Guidelines
This is a group assignment. Use the following guidelines to summarize your group’s article and develop a 15-20 minute Tegrity
presentation. Your review should show that you can recognize arguments and engage in critical thinking about the course
content. You need to address all the questions indicated in this guideline as they pertains to your article. Group presentation is
worth up to 100 points. You are to address the following sections in your presentation. The presentation will thoroughly analyze
and address the following:
I.
Author(s), Title, Abstract (10%)
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
II.
Article (10%)
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
Points Earned: ______
Thoroughly explain your own reactions and considered opinions regarding the work
PowerPoint/Tegrity Presentation. (15%)
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
Points Earned: ______
What exactly does the work contribute and relate to the overall topic of your course and/or assignment?
What general problems and concepts in your discipline and course does it engage with?
What implications does this topic have on nursing care?
What implications does this topic have on advance practice?
What implications does this topic have on future research?
What implications does this topic have on nursing administration?
What theoretical, ethical, legal issues and topics for further discussion does the work raise?
Reactions/Opinions (15%)
a.
Points Earned: ______
Does the author clearly state an explicit thesis?
Does the author have a specific point of view?
Is the article “persuasive”? If so, please explain.
Significance of Topic (35%)
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
Points Earned: ______
the specific topic of the article is easily identified
the overall purpose of the article is identified, clear, accurate, and unambiguous
who is the intended audience?
is the article appropriate for intended audience?
what kinds of material does the work present (e.g. primary documents or secondary material, personal observations, literary
analysis, quantitative data, biographical or historical accounts)?
how is this material used to demonstrate and argue the thesis? (As well as indicating the overall argumentative structure of the
work, your review could quote or summarize specific passages to describe the author’s presentation, including writing style and
tone).
Statement of Thesis (10%)
a.
b.
c.
Points Earned: ______
the author(s) qualification/position indicate a degree of knowledge in this particular field, explain
how well the acknowledgements, reference list, and index provide clues about where and how the piece was originally
published, and about the author’s background and position
whether the title is clear, accurate, and/or unambiguous
whether the abstract offers a clear overview of the study or not, and whether
the abstract includes the research problem, sample, methodology, findings and/or recommendations
Points Earned: ______
Overall presentation
Style/manner of presentation.
Creativity, presentation appeal (poise, pronunciation, voice quality, pitch, clarity)
Ability to stimulate discussion (Each audience member is to post any discussion questions/comments using the “Discussion Tool”).
PowerPoint: Typing, neatness, spelling, punctuation, grammar
References in APA format
Time Management (15-20 minutes in length)
Content (2.5%)
a. Is accurate, thorough, and not just a reiteration of text
b. Includes interpretation and clarification of meanings
c. Is organized, coherent, tied together and fluent
Evaluation by Group Members (individual score = evaluation avg from group members) (2.5%)
Points Earned: ______
Points Earned: ______
(individual grade)
Obesity
Obesity Symposium
CLINICAL TRIALS AND INVESTIGATIONS
Cell Phone Intervention for You (CITY): A Randomized,
Controlled Trial of Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention
for Young Adults Using Mobile Technology
Laura P. Svetkey1,2, Bryan C. Batch3, Pao-Hwa Lin1,2, Stephen S. Intille4,5, Leonor Corsino3, Crystal C. Tyson1,
Hayden B. Bosworth6,7,8,9, Steven C. Grambow10, Corrine Voils6,9, Catherine Loria11, John A. Gallis10, Jenifer Schwager1,2,
and Gary B. Bennett12,13
Objective: To determine the effect on weight of two mobile technology-based (mHealth) behavioral
weight loss interventions in young adults.
Methods: Randomized, controlled comparative effectiveness trial in 18- to 35-year-olds with
BMI 25 kg/m2 (overweight/obese), with participants randomized to 24 months of mHealth intervention
delivered by interactive smartphone application on a cell phone (CP); personal coaching enhanced by
smartphone self-monitoring (PC); or Control.
Results: The 365 randomized participants had mean baseline BMI of 35 kg/m2. Final weight was measured in 86% of participants. CP was not superior to Control at any measurement point. PC participants
lost significantly more weight than Controls at 6 months (net effect 21.92 kg [CI 23.17, 20.67],
P 5 0.003), but not at 12 and 24 months.
Conclusions: Despite high intervention engagement and study retention, the inclusion of behavioral principles and tools in both interventions, and weight loss in all treatment groups, CP did not lead to weight
loss, and PC did not lead to sustained weight loss relative to Control. Although mHealth solutions offer
broad dissemination and scalability, the CITY results sound a cautionary note concerning intervention delivery by mobile applications. Effective intervention may require the efficiency of mobile technology, the social
support and human interaction of personal coaching, and an adaptive approach to intervention design.
Obesity (2015) 23, 2133-2141. doi:10.1002/oby.21226
Introduction
Obesity is present in 35% of young adults (defined as age 18-35
years) in the US (1) and deserves attention: Weight gain is most
rapid during these years (2,3); increasing body mass index (BMI)
in young adulthood increases the risk of developing metabolic
syndrome over the subsequent 15 years almost 20-fold (4); and
weight gain in early adulthood is also associated with increased
coronary calcification in middle age (5), forecasting future cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. These data suggest the need for
effective and sustainable weight control strategies early in adult
life (6).
1
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Correspondence: Laura P. Svetkey
(svetk001@mc.duke.edu) 2 Sarah W. Stedman Nutrition and Metabolism Center, Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
3
Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
4
College of Computer and Information Science, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 5 Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern
University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 6 Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North
Carolina, USA 7 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA 8 School of Nursing,
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA 9 Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical
Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA 10 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
11
Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA 12 Department of
Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA 13 Duke Obesity Prevention Program, Duke University Medical Center,
Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Funding agencies: The CITY study was sponsored by grant number U01HL096720 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, a component of the National
Institutes of Health (NIH).
Disclosure: Dr. Svetkey is a consultant to Oregon Center for Applied Science (ORCAS; Eugene, Oregon), a health innovation company that creates self-management
programs to improve physical and emotional well-being. Dr. Grambow is a consultant to Gilead Sciences as a member of multiple DSMBs. Although the relationship is not
perceived to represent a conflict with the present work, it has been included in the spirit of full disclosure. Dr. Bennett is a member of the scientific advisory board at
Nutrisystem and owns shares in Scale Down, a digital weight loss vendor.
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.
Received: 21 March 2015; Accepted: 15 June 2015; Published online 4 November 2015. doi:10.1002/oby.21226
www.obesityjournal.org
Obesity | VOLUME 23 | NUMBER 11 | NOVEMBER 2015
2133
Obesity
CITY Weight Loss Trial—Main Results Svetkey et al.
Effective behavioral weight loss strategies involve regular personal
contact with a trained interventionist using behavioral techniques
such as self-monitoring and goal setting (6). Evidence-based obesity
treatment recommendations endorse high-intensity intervention: 14
in-person interventionist sessions over 6 months (6). However, the
optimal behavioral “dose” is unclear (7), and a smaller effect with
lower intensity intervention might be offset by the potential for
increased scalability. In addition, trials testing comprehensive behavioral approaches have primarily included middle-aged adults and
suggest that intervention is more effective as age increases (8,9).
Thus the potential of personal coaching for weight loss in a younger
population is unknown.
Similarly, commercial mobile technology mHealth applications
(“apps”) are widely downloaded for weight loss but have not been
rigorously tested for efficacy or effectiveness. Behavior change techniques known to produce clinically meaningful weight loss are often
absent (10,11), calling into question whether apps can have the
desired effect (12,13).
Because of the potential for scalability and wide dissemination, we
sought to determine the weight loss potential of mobile technology
on its own. In order to improve the efficiency of behavior change
methods known to be effective, we tested a low-intensity personal
coaching intervention enhanced by mobile technology. The Cell
Phone Intervention for You (CITY) study was a three-arm randomized trial comparing the effect on weight over 24 months of
behavioral intervention that was delivered almost entirely via a
smartphone app of our design (CP) or behavioral intervention delivered through personal coaching enhanced by self-monitoring via
smartphone (PC), each compared to Control. We hypothesized that
CP and PC would each be superior to Control. We made no a priori
hypothesis about CP relative to PC.
Methods
The CITY study was one of seven trials in the Early Adult Reduction of weight through LifestYle Intervention (EARLY) consortium,
sponsored by NHLBI (1U01HL096720). Each EARLY trial was
conducted independently. However, in order to facilitate future comparison, the EARLY trials had common eligibility criteria, measurement methods, and primary outcome (14). The design of CITY is
reported elsewhere (15).
Study population
CITY was approved by the Duke Institutional Review Board and an
NHLBI-appointed Protocol Review Committee/Data and Safety
Monitoring Board (DSMB). Enrollment occurred between December
2010 and February 2012. Individuals were eligible if they were aged
18-35 years, had overweight or obesity (BMI 25 kg/m2), and used
a mobile telephone. For logistical reasons, participants were required
to receive service from either Verizon or AT&T.
Individuals were excluded if they were taking weight loss medications or corticosteroids, had weight loss surgery, weighed more than
440 lbs (the limit of study scales), or had any condition deemed
unsafe for the study. Recruitment occurred primarily by advertising
and mass mailings.
2134
Obesity | VOLUME 23 | NUMBER 11 | NOVEMBER 2015
Pre-screening assessment occurred by participants’ choice of telephone, interactive voice response (IVR), short message service
(SMS), or online survey. Participants were further screened by
telephone followed by a face-to-face visit, during which all participants provided written informed consent.
Randomization occurred at a separate face-to-face visit within 10
weeks of screening, at which baseline weight was obtained.
Randomization was stratified by gender and BMI (overweight [BMI
25 and
Purchase answer to see full
attachment