MGT655 Internal Processes in Supply Chain Chipotle Contamination Crisis Paper Internal processes of a company contribute to the company’s overall effective

MGT655 Internal Processes in Supply Chain Chipotle Contamination Crisis Paper Internal processes of a company contribute to the company’s overall effectiveness. Identifying ways to improve internal processes helps build a highly efficient organization. Root causes need to be identified. Methods to identify root causes may require substantial analysis or be apparent based on a major problem within the organization. For example, review the assigned article, “Inside Chipotle’s Contamination Crisis: Smugness and Happy Talk About Sustainability Aren’t Working Anymore,” from Bloomberg Businessweek. Research several other sources regarding Chipotle’s food contamination crisis. Create a flowchart of the original supply chain and how Chipotle supplies each of the restaurant chains. Provide your own commentary. Create another flowchart that suggests a new way to supply the restaurant chains. Review another restaurant chain that does not currently have a major public problem but would benefit from evaluating its manufacturing process to improve competitiveness. Specifically, provide recommendations on how to improve the company’s current supply chain. Create a flowchart to illustrate your recommendations. Provide a summary of how you came to your recommendations. Include any formal strategies and informal thought processes you used to reach your conclusions. Provide rationale for either using or not using Six Sigma methodology, ISO quality benchmarking, lean supply chain processes, or TQM. Submit all three flowcharts and commentary for each flowchart in a single document. Provide three to five resources to support your response. While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Course Code
MGT-655
Class Code
MGT-655-O500
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Chipotle Flowcharts and Commentary
40.0%
Restaurant Flowchart and Commentary
30.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Documentation
10.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
10.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Internal Processes
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Chipotle flowcharts are absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
Restaurant flowchart and commentary are absent,
inappropriate, or irrelevant.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Sources are not documented.
90.0
Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)
Chipotle flowcharts make weak connections with several
gaps, and they are weak or marginal with gaps in
presentation.
Restaurant flowchart and commentary make weak
connections with several gaps, and they are weak or marginal
with gaps in presentation.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
Chipotle flowcharts make connections at a cursory level and
contain minimal gaps. Supporting sources show some
understanding of the content.
Restaurant flowchart and commentary make connections at a
cursory level and contain minimal gaps. Supporting sources
show some understanding of the content.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
Chipotle flowcharts make meaningful connections, contain no
gaps, and are clear and integrated. Supporting sources
illustrate an understanding of the content.
Restaurant flowchart and commentary make meaningful
connections, contain no gaps, and are clear and integrated.
Supporting sources illustrate an understanding of the
content.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Chipotle flowcharts make meaningful connections, contain no
gaps, and are thorough and well integrated. Supporting
sources illustrate a deep understanding of the content.
Restaurant flowchart and commentary make meaningful
connections, contain no gaps, and are thorough and well
integrated. Supporting sources illustrate a deep
understanding of the content.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Comments
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment