American University Concealed Carry Weapon Permits Article Analysis Essay Purpose: A close reader of the world looks beneath the surface of behavior and la
American University Concealed Carry Weapon Permits Article Analysis Essay Purpose: A close reader of the world looks beneath the surface of behavior and language and explores instances of communication as rhetorical events rich with meaning. The purpose of this assignment is to analyze the article Concealed Carry Weapon Permits: A Second Amendment Right or a Recipe for Disaster on Our Nations Campuses? and identify and discuss the writers rhetorical decisions and their impacts. Rather than state whether you believe the article is good or bad, or whether you liked it or not, apply a close reading of the text.
I. Written Essay
Craft a coherent rhetorical analysis essay that includes the following two components:
Very brief summary of the article
Close reading of the work
For the summary portion (1), rather than describe everything in the article, very briefly share only the main points of the article. The summary should be no more than a brief paragraph. In your close reading (2)the heart of this assignmentyou should include and provide evidence for the following information:
Who is the author? (name, title, and credentials)
Where was the article published? (newspaper/magazine/website title)
What is the purpose and goal of the article?
Who is the intended audience of the article?
Must have a thesis statement with 2 or 3 points
How does the author use rhetorical appeals, and for what purpose?
Ethos: appeals to the character/expertise of the writer and cited authorities
Logos: appeals based on logic, reasoning, and relevant evidence
Pathos: appeals to the beliefs, emotions, and values of the audience
What rhetorical choices does the author make to achieve his/her goals and was the author successful?
Diction, figurative language, tone, organization, length
What evidence (if any) does the author provide to support her/his claims? (Total of 6 quotes from article)
Where does this evidence come from?
What research might the author have conducted before writing the article?
What information does the author not include in the article, and why?
Is the author biased in any way?
Is the article trustworthy?
II. Requirements
It is critical that you provide the reasoning for all of your analytical claims involving the article.
Be sure to support all of your analytical points with specific evidence from the article, which will help your audience comprehend and support your rhetorical analysis. Since your audience has learned about the elements of a rhetorical situation (e.g. audience, purpose, context, genre) and rhetorical appeals (e.g. ethos, logos, pathos), you do not need to define these concepts in your essay.
Format requirements: MS Word (.doc) following:
Times New Roman, 12 points
Double Spaced
2 to 2 ½ pages for full credit
Use the cover page attached/must be submitted online & printed (submit the same paper both online & print)
Before you submit your essay, re-read your writing, preferably aloud, to detect ideas that need to be tightened and/or reorganized for clarity.
Do not forget to use your Signal Phrases
Follow the example discussed in class (Rhetorical Analysis Sample Essay) Your essay should be structured in that format.
and here is the article , and the example that she give us
and must include the 6 quote &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
please remember use the different signal phrase
and may can add the subtitle make it more clear Are you sure this is enough information to work with? We recommend you double check your requirements
information you think is relevant. Good information is key to a good answer.
VAGUE REQUIREMENTS
Studiant
JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH, VOL. 58, NO. 2
Editor’s Note
Concealed Carry Weapon Permits: A Second
Amendment Right or a Recipe for Disaster on
Our Nation’s Campuses?
F11
Reginald Fennell, PhD, CHES, F-ACHA, EMT-B
{
U
Abstract. Crimes on college campuses can “strike fear” into the
lives of those in higher education and a shooting is one of the
crimes that ranks at the top of the most feared acts of violence.
Maybe more direct counseling for clients who have weapons with
regard to anticipatory guidance on firearms is needed. However, the
debate continues with proposed legislation in different states regard-
ing Second Amendment rights to legally carry concealed weapons
on our Nation’s campuses. What should be our response to this
legislation?
Keywords: college students, violence, crimes, weapons, firearms,
guns
W
hile all crimes on college campuses can “strike
fear” into the lives of those in higher education,
a shooting is one of the crimes that ranks at the
top of the most feared acts of violence. In this issue of the
Journal of American College Health (JACH) the article by
Price, Mrdjenovich, Thompson, and Dake presents research
on the topic of firearms from the perspective of the role of
college counseling centers and what counselors are doing for
their clients with regard to anticipatory guidance on firearms.
Price and his colleagues cite a 2002 study published in JACH
stating, “A study of 119 four-year colleges found that 4%
of college students reported having a firearm at college, ap-
proximately 700,000 firearms based on the size of the current
college population. The 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Surveil-
lance System (YRBSS) of students in grades 9 through 12 as
reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) indicated that “nationwide, 18.0% of students had
carried a weapon (e.g., a gun, knife, or club) on at least 1 day
during the 30 days before the survey and 5.2% of students
had carried a gun on at least 1 day during the 30 days before
the survey”.1, p.6
Tragic shootings on college campuses such as Virginia
Technological University and Northern Illinois University
have launched the debate for the right to carry concealed
weapons on college campuses into the legislative houses of
many States. Fall 2009 the legislature in the state of Michigan
will once again debate the issue of allowing legal gun permit
holders to carry their concealed weapons on college cam-
puses. Proposed legislation in Michigan would delete the
following language from current legislation; “A dormitory
or classroom of a community college, college, or univer-
sity2 thus allowing legal permit holders to carry concealed
weapons on campuses.
Students for Concealed Carry on Campuses highlight on
its website that “Utah is the only state to allow concealed
carry at all public colleges/universities, by prohibiting public
colleges/universities from creating their own restrictions.
Students for Concealed Carry on Campuses and the National
Rifle Association (NRA)* are supportive of the proposed new
legislation in Michigan. While writing this editorial each
group had a link to information about this proposed legisla-
tion on their respective homepages. The NRA had it listed
under “Legislative Alerts.
The American Association of State Colleges and Univer-
sities (AASCU) has taken a strong position against such
legislation stating:
»3
Disclaimer: This editorial represents solely the opinion of the
author and neither the views of Taylor & Francis Group, LLC., nor
the views of the American College Health Association. Dr Fennell
is an executive editor
for JACH and a professor of health education
in the Department of Kinesiology and Health at Miami University
in Oxford, Ohio.
Copyright © 2009 Heldref Publications
Given the overriding goal to ensure that campuses are safe en-
vironments, the American Association of State Colleges and
Universities (AASCU) maintains support for existing state
99
Minimum length: 80 characters; Recommended length: 250+ characters
Character count: 138
LOOKS A BIT SHORT…
Are you sure this is enough information to work with? We recommend you double check your requirements and add any
information you think is relevant. Good information is key to a good answer.
VAGUE REQUIREMENTS
DETAIL
PEAMIDEMENTS
.docx
Fennell
laws that ban concealed weapons from public college cam-
puses, or that provide for institutional and system autonomy
with regard to concealed weapons policy. Further, the asso-
ciation discourages the passage of new state legislation that
would overturn or weaken concealed weapons bans on cam-
pus.S.p. 67
defend him/herself and is shot in a case of mistaken identity
by the police or another person with a CCW?
These types of questions are great for debate in the halls of
academe. However one point is certain, although rare, there
will unfortunately continue to be violence on our college
campuses. Some of the violence will be committed with the
use of firearms by those who have mental health problems.
Unfortunately, those with legal concealed carry weapon
(CCW) permits who follow the law will be defenseless to
protect themselves during an attack. Given the tragedies we
have witnessed in the past few years involving firearms on
our college campuses, we should take as many steps as pos-
sible to make sure that anyone with a weapon is mentally
stable. This includes providing more direct counseling for
clients with regard to anticipatory guidance on firearms.
FI
@
2
NOTE
For comments and further information, address correspon-
dence to Dr Reginald Fennell, 107A Phillips Hall, Oxford,
OH 45056, USA (e-mail: fennelr@muohio.edu).
Most of us fear that if these laws were passed our campuses
would have scores if not hundreds of students (faculty and
staff) on our Nation’s campuses carrying concealed weapons.
Perhaps our greatest fear is that in an outburst of anger one
of these individuals with a concealed weapon would use it
against an innocent person(s) on campus. U.S. citizens are
already legally carrying concealed weapons and we have
not seen an increase in crimes of passion/anger committed
by legal citizens with concealed carry permits. One
argy-
ment is that students, in particular, are not mature enough
to handle the stressors of college and emerging adulthood
aird may resort to using their weapons to resolve differences.
This is clearly a hypothesis based on fear. However, as a
researcher, some of the more interesting questions would
be how many students (faculty and staff) have Concealed
Carry Weapon (CCW) permits? How many students with
permits would carry weapons on campus, if they had the le-
gal right to do so? How often do students with CCW permits
carry their firearms? These and similar questions should be
queried.
Although the voices against such legislation are strong
and powerful, I posit that we have little to fear from citizens
with legal CCW permits carrying guns on campuses and in
our classrooms. I agree that in volatile situations where there
could be a shooter on a campus, there could be a number of
problems. How does anyone know who the real perpetrator
is? What happens when police arrive on the scene and they
see someone with a gun? What if the person was trying to
te
A
ur
REFERENCES
1. CDC. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance-United States, 2007.
MMWR June 6, 2008:57(No SS-4).
2. Michigan Senate Bill No. 747. http://www.legislature.mi.gov/
documents/20092010/billintroduced/Senate/htm/2009-SIB-0747.
htm. Accessed September 4, 2009.
3. Students for Concealed Carry on Campus (SCCC). www.
concealedcampus.org. Accessed September 4, 2009.
4. National Rifle Association (NRA). http://www.nra.org. Accessed
September 4, 2009.
5. Harnisch, TL. (November 2008). American Association of State
Colleges and Universities (AASCU). Concealed Weapons on State
College Campuses: In Pursuit of Individual Liberty and Col-
lective Security. www.aascu.org/media/pm/pdf/pmdec08.pdf. Ac-
cessed September 4, 2009.
alt
optio
too much
question
Are you sure this is enough information to work with? We recommend you double check your requirements
information you think is relevant. Good information is key to a good answer.
VAGUE REQUIREMENTS
Studiant
JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH, VOL. 58, NO. 2
Editor’s Note
Concealed Carry Weapon Permits: A Second
Amendment Right or a Recipe for Disaster on
Our Nation’s Campuses?
F11
Reginald Fennell, PhD, CHES, F-ACHA, EMT-B
{
U
Abstract. Crimes on college campuses can “strike fear” into the
lives of those in higher education and a shooting is one of the
crimes that ranks at the top of the most feared acts of violence.
Maybe more direct counseling for clients who have weapons with
regard to anticipatory guidance on firearms is needed. However, the
debate continues with proposed legislation in different states regard-
ing Second Amendment rights to legally carry concealed weapons
on our Nation’s campuses. What should be our response to this
legislation?
Keywords: college students, violence, crimes, weapons, firearms,
guns
W
hile all crimes on college campuses can “strike
fear” into the lives of those in higher education,
a shooting is one of the crimes that ranks at the
top of the most feared acts of violence. In this issue of the
Journal of American College Health (JACH) the article by
Price, Mrdjenovich, Thompson, and Dake presents research
on the topic of firearms from the perspective of the role of
college counseling centers and what counselors are doing for
their clients with regard to anticipatory guidance on firearms.
Price and his colleagues cite a 2002 study published in JACH
stating, “A study of 119 four-year colleges found that 4%
of college students reported having a firearm at college, ap-
proximately 700,000 firearms based on the size of the current
college population. The 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Surveil-
lance System (YRBSS) of students in grades 9 through 12 as
reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) indicated that “nationwide, 18.0% of students had
carried a weapon (e.g., a gun, knife, or club) on at least 1 day
during the 30 days before the survey and 5.2% of students
had carried a gun on at least 1 day during the 30 days before
the survey”.1, p.6
Tragic shootings on college campuses such as Virginia
Technological University and Northern Illinois University
have launched the debate for the right to carry concealed
weapons on college campuses into the legislative houses of
many States. Fall 2009 the legislature in the state of Michigan
will once again debate the issue of allowing legal gun permit
holders to carry their concealed weapons on college cam-
puses. Proposed legislation in Michigan would delete the
following language from current legislation; “A dormitory
or classroom of a community college, college, or univer-
sity2 thus allowing legal permit holders to carry concealed
weapons on campuses.
Students for Concealed Carry on Campuses highlight on
its website that “Utah is the only state to allow concealed
carry at all public colleges/universities, by prohibiting public
colleges/universities from creating their own restrictions.
Students for Concealed Carry on Campuses and the National
Rifle Association (NRA)* are supportive of the proposed new
legislation in Michigan. While writing this editorial each
group had a link to information about this proposed legisla-
tion on their respective homepages. The NRA had it listed
under “Legislative Alerts.
The American Association of State Colleges and Univer-
sities (AASCU) has taken a strong position against such
legislation stating:
»3
Disclaimer: This editorial represents solely the opinion of the
author and neither the views of Taylor & Francis Group, LLC., nor
the views of the American College Health Association. Dr Fennell
is an executive editor
for JACH and a professor of health education
in the Department of Kinesiology and Health at Miami University
in Oxford, Ohio.
Copyright © 2009 Heldref Publications
Given the overriding goal to ensure that campuses are safe en-
vironments, the American Association of State Colleges and
Universities (AASCU) maintains support for existing state
99
too much sueseffeilly
whole page
Analysis explains
how the quotes
show the effective
use of ethos, as
noted in the thesis
Transition and
topic sentence
about the second
point from the
thesis
done her homework and has provided facts and statistics, as well as expert opinions to
support her claim. She also uses personal examples from her own home life to introduce
and support the issue, which shows that she has a personal stake in and first-hand
experience with the problem.
Adding to her ethos appeals, Grose uses strong appeals to logos, with many facts
and statistics and logical progressions of ideas. She points out facts about her marriage
and the distribution of household chores: My husband and I both work. We split
midnight baby feedings …but … he will admit that he’s never cleaned the bathroom, that I
do the dishes nine times out of ten, and that he barely knows how the washer and dryer
work in the apartment we’ve lived in for over eight months. These facts introduce and
support the idea that Grose does more household chores than her husband. Grose
Quote that
illustrates appeals
to logos
Quote that
illustrates appeals
to logos
Analysis explains
how the quotes
show the effective
use of logos, as
noted in the thesis
continues with many statistics:
[A]bout 55 percent of American mothers employed full time do some housework
on an average day, while only 18 percent of employed fathers do. … [W]orking
women with children are still doing a week and a half more of second shift”
work each year than their male partners. … Even in the famously gender-neutral
Sweden, women do 45 minutes more housework a day than their male partners.
These statistics are a few of many that logically support her claim that it is a substantial
and real problem that men do not do their fair share of the chores. The details and
numbers build an appeal to logos and impress upon the reader that this is a problem worth
discussing.
Along with strong logos appeals, Grose effectively makes appeals to pathos in
the beginning and middle sections. Her introduction is full of emotionally-charged words
and phrases that create a sympathetic image; Grose notes that she was eight months
pregnant” and her husband found it difficult to “fight with a massively pregnant person.
The image she evokes of the challenges and vulnerabilities of being so pregnant, as well
as the high emotions a woman feels at that time effectively introduce the argument and its
seriousness. Her goal is to make the reader feel sympathy for her. Adding to this idea
are words and phrases such as, insisted, argued,” “not fun,” “sucks” “headachey,” “be
judged,” “be shunned (Grose). All of these words evoke negative emotions about
cleaning, which makes the reader sympathize with women who feel judged” and
shunnedvery negative feelings. Another feeling Grose reinforces with her word
choice is the concept of fairness: “fair share,” “a week and a half more of second shift’
work,” “more housework,” “more gendered and less frequent.” These words help
Transition and
topic sentence
about the third
point from the
thesis
Quotes that
illustrate appeals
to pathos
Analysis explains
how the quotes
show the effective
use of pathos, as
noted in the thesis
confucian_and_b…
20190613113544confucian_and_buddhist_inte
Roman Regular
12
a
B I U
WICO
14
16
18 110 112
. It was not u Vurugu w IIIII vuvuus TIC
and secular writing including Confucian philosophy, calend
relationship between Chinese, Korean, and Japanese Bud
odern period. Korean Buddhist schools emerged with all o
ng developed in the Chinese mainland. Having drawn this
nger of Buddhist teachings and Confucian philosophies in E
dhism in India and Central Asia intensified the more when
to the Far East regions (7. With Confucian culture, which
easier for these countries to share any new teachings.
ina harbored few practices of Buddhism early in the first
ucian religious culture. When Indian merchants and Buddhis
irth century, Buddhist practices and teachings intensified in th
ause it was part of their traditions. Koreans were in close rel
same teachings spread to Koreans who then became strong ag
penetrated Korean and went beyond the original Sinitic traditi
rest of the countries in the East.
supports thesis
establish the unfairness that exists when women do all of the cleaning, and they are an
appeal to pathos, or the readers’ feelings of frustration and anger with injustice.
Transition and
However, the end of the article lacks the same level of effectiveness in the
topic sentence
about fourth point
appeals to ethos. For example, Grose notes that when men do housework, they are
from thesis
considered to be enacting small instances of gender heroism,” or “SIGH’s’which,
Quote illustrates
how the author
barf. The usage of the word barf’ is jarring to the reader; unprofessional and immature,
uses appeal to
ethos
it is a shift from the researched, intelligent voice she has established and the reader is less
Analysis explains
likely to take the author seriously. This damages the strength of her credibility and her
how quote
argum
Additionally, her last statement in the article refers to her husband in a way that Transition and
topic sentence
weakens the argument. While returning to the introduction’s hook in the conclusion is a about fourth point
from thesis
frequently-used strategy, Grose chooses to return to her discussion of her husband in a
Quote illustrates
humorous way: Grose discusses solutions, and says there is a huge, untapped market.
how the author
for toilet-scrubbing iPods. I bet my husband would buy one.” Returning to her own
uses appeal to
ethos
marriage and husband is an appeal to ethos or personal credibility, and while that works
Analysis explains
well in the introduction, in the conclusion, it lacks the strength and seriousness that the
how quote
topic deserves and was given earlier in the article.
Though Grose begins the essay by effectively persuading her readers of the
Conclusion returns
unfair distribution of home-maintenance cleaning labor, she loses her power in the end, to ideas in the
thesis and further
where she most needs to drive home her argument. Readers can see the problem exists in
develops them
both her marriage and throughout the world; however, her shift to humor and sarcasm
makes the reader not take the problem as seriously in the end. Grose could have more
Last sentence
seriously driven home the point that a woman’s work could be done: by a man.
returns to the hook
in the introduction
supports thesis
il
Works Cited
Grose, Jessica. Cleaning: The Final Feminist Frontier.” New Republic. The New
Republic, 19 Mar. 2013. Web. 28 Mar. 2014.
This document was developed by the
College Writing Center
STLCC-Meramec
Created 2/2015 by HSC
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
