NRS490 GCU Obesity Paradox in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Literature Evaluation In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is es

NRS490 GCU Obesity Paradox in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Literature Evaluation In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. Being able to articulate the information and successfully summarize relevant peer-reviewed articles in a scholarly fashion helps to support the student’s ability and confidence to further develop and synthesize the progressively more complex assignments that constitute the components of the course change proposal capstone project.For this assignment, the student will provide a synopsis of eight peer-reviewed articles from nursing journals using an evaluation table that determines the level and strength of evidence for each of the eight articles. The articles should be current within the last 5 years and closely relate to the PICOT statement developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project. Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” resource to complete this assignment.While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Literature Evaluation Table
Student Name: Wendy Fernandez
Change Topic (2-3 sentences):
Criteria
Article 1
Article 2
Article 3
Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and
Permalink or Working
Link to Access Article
Article Title and Year
Published
Research Questions
(Qualitative)/Hypothesis
(Quantitative), and
Purposes/Aim of Study
Design (Type of
Quantitative, or Type of
Qualitative)
Setting/Sample
Methods:
Intervention/Instruments
Analysis
Key Findings
Recommendations
Explanation of How the
Article Supports
EBP/Capstone Project
© 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Article 4
Criteria
Article 5
Article 6
Article 7
Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and
Permalink or Working
Link to Access Article
Article Title and Year
Published
Research Questions
(Qualitative)/Hypothesis
(Quantitative), and
Purposes/Aim of Study
Design (Type of
Quantitative, or Type of
Qualitative)
Setting/Sample
Methods:
Intervention/Instruments
Analysis
Key Findings
Recommendations
Explanation of How the
Article Supports
EBP/Capstone
© 2017. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Article 8

Purchase answer to see full
attachment