Discussion on the categorical imperative | Quick Homework Help
Im studying and need help with a English question to help me learn.
This discussion will require you to have carefully read Chapter 4 of the textbook, as well as the assigned portions of Immanuel Kants (2008) Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals.
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Thames.5057.18.1/sections/ch04sec4.2#ch04sec4.2
If you have trouble opening the book link above, message me ASAP
Kants text and the textbook discuss two formulations or ways of expressing Kants Categorical Imperative, the Formula of Universal Law and the Formula of Humanity. For each formula, Kant considers four test cases to explain how it applies: Suicide, False Promises, Cultivating Ones Talents, and Beneficence.
- Engage with the text:
Choose one of these test cases (it can be from either formula), and explain in your own words the reasoning that leads to the conclusion Kant defends. You should first explain the Categorical Imperative itself, focusing on the particular formula you are considering, and then carefully show how that principle leads to a particular conclusion.
- Reflect on the theories:
Would a utilitarian come to a different conclusion? If so, explain why. If a utilitarian would come to the same conclusion in this case, could there be a variation in the case that would lead the utilitarian and Kant to come to different conclusions?
- Reflect on yourself:
Do you agree with Kants conclusion? If not, explain the flaws in his reasoning. If you do agree, and you think a utilitarian would come to a different conclusion in this or a slightly varied case, why do you think that Kants reasoning is superior to the utilitarians?
