I need help with a Law question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

Two Union Tribune articles that cover the SDSU Racial Profiling report submitted to the SD Mayors Office have been linked below. The first article was written right after the findings became public. The second article was written a few months later and outlined the impact the study had on the city. The original report was written by several members of the SDSU Criminal Justice Department and as with any study of a controversial topic, there is disagreement in regards to their findings. I’ve attached the full report from Prof. Chanin for your review.

What do you think of the findings? Are the criticisms mentioned in the newspaper article fair? What do you think can be done in the city to improve this dimension of law enforcement?

I will leave this topic open for two weeks until October 12th. In addition, for this discussion only, you may earn up to three points for your submission, but for three points I expect you to tie elements of the study with elements of the news articles as well as your own opinions. Although I don’t expect you to read the entire study, please review the overall findings and if desired, take a look at their methodology (criteria used to conduct their study)

San Diego must acknowledge racial bias in police stops, leaders say (Links to an external site.)

San Diego City Council to debate racial profiling study, explore policy changes

TWO-THREE WELL WRITTEN PARAGRAPHS. PROVIDE INFORMATION AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS FROM THE LINKS PROVIDED AND PROVIDE PERSONAL OPINION. MENTION THE LINKS AND REFER TO THE LINKS BUT DO NOT SITE.