Mitochondria certainly do show the markers of a being a cell within a cell. They have their own DNA and transcriptional machinery, they divide on their own, they have their own ribosomes, etc. However just because they have these things does not mean they are derived from some prokaryotic ancestor. What I would like to see in terms of more evidence is what changes these mitochondria have undergone relative to that ancestor and how those changes have taken place. For instance mitochondria do not have the ability to make most of the lipids they need to maintain the structural integrity of their membranes. Of course the prokaryotic ancestor would have had to do this. How then did the present day mitochondria lose this ability?
Science is the pursuit and application of knowledge and understanding of the natural and social…
Clearly stating the definition, the values, the meaning of such values and the type of…
All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures…
All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures…
https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2018/04/25/605092520/high-paying-trade-jobs-sit-empty-while-high-school-grads-line-up-for-university Click on the link above. Read the entire link and answer the questions below…
All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures…