Description
Read Lead Like Jesus chapter 3, “Jesus the Servant.” Answer the following questions in an initial post. Address each question with several paragraphs. Answers should reflect both your professional experience and the course materials covered this week. Cite the Blanchard, Hodges, & Hendry text and your textbook as appropriate. Other sources are not required, but welcome; if used, cite them as well. Cite all sources using APA in-text citations and a reference list at the end of your post. Initial posts must be at least 300 words in length. Remember to be respectful and professional in all posts; keep company and individual identities anonymous. You may write in first person. You may wish to compose your post in a temporary document and paste it into the Moodle text box After reading through the chapter, review the scripture on page 15 from Matthew 20. Summarize your thoughts as you were reading this and discuss your personal learning outcome from the chapter and this specific passage.
Scholarly Discussion Grading Rubric Criteria Below Expectation (< 50%) Basic (50% – 79%) Proficient (80% – 100%) Post Quality 75%
Post shows little forethought, planning, and/or conveys little meaning. Shallow connection to course materials. Application missing or invalid.
Shows some evidence of reading course materials. Little content mastery and only trivial or obvious insights. Application to experience or industry is superficial or abbreviated. Only partially follows instructions.
Shows solid evidence of having read course materials with clear connections to content knowledge. Discussion provides meaningful analysis and full development. Exhibits original thinking. Application to experience or industry is appropriate and informative. Follows all instructions completely. If support required, include these criteria in post quality
Does not support claims, argument, or conclusion with valid sources.
Inaccurate usage of selected sources, or sources are not scholarly. References have little validity to the claims, conclusion, or argument.
Sources utilized bring validity and richness to the claim, conclusions, and/or argument. Paraphrased material is accurate. Sources are scholarly or qualified. If reply post, also consider these criteria in post quality
Reply is trivial, superficial, or insignificant. May be based on statements such as “I agree or disagree.”
Contribution enriches discussion only a little. It restates what others stated or evaluates the initial post with no substantial additions.
Good analysis of others’ posts; shows critical thinking. Extends discussion and adds value by building on classmates’ posts. Connects to course material. Has respectful tone. Presentation and Writing 25%
No evidence of proofreading or attempt at conventional writing mechanics, style or vocabulary. Difficult or impossible to read with comprehension.
Writing lacks clarity. Contains enough errors and/or unorganized such that it interferes with reading content. Citations of outside sources formatted incorrectly per APA.
Clear and concise comments that are style appropriate with rich vocabulary. Grammar and spelling are nearly error free. Organized well. Appropriate and required citations formatted properly per APA.
Version 2019-08-6
