PPP Ethic Essay Assignment | Essay Help Services

PPP Ethic Essay Scenario, Instructions, Tips, Rubric and Revision Process In preparation for this essay, read through the 2015 AAMFT Code of Ethics. A link is provided. SCENARIO: In your personal life, you are in a committed relationship, yet you find yourself noticing that your client is quite attractive and repeatedly having intimate thoughts about this particular client. To date you have been successful at pushing it away from your mind when you have the thought. One day your client discloses to you that s/he thinks about you a lot outside of sessions and wonders if the two of you may be able to start seeing each other socially. INSTRUCTIONS: Based on this scenario, write a 2-3 page essay that addresses each of the following: 1. What does the 2015 AAMFT Code of Ethics include that is relevant to this scenario? 2. What does the recent MFT literature say about ethics in situations like this? 3. What is your personal philosophy of ethics in general? 4. How would you handle this situation? Be sure to think clinically here and list a specific plan. TIPS: Please remember the following when addressing the areas above. Failure to fully address any one of these areas will result in a requirement for you to resubmit the essay. 1. Adhere to the 2-3 page limit (in essay format, not bulleted or numbered responses). 2. Include properly formatted APA citations, as well as proper spelling & grammar. 3. Use specific sections of the 2015 Code of Ethics and cite them correctly. 4. Discuss the case systemically (not from mere linear perspective), focusing on both the client and the therapist. 5. Accurately cite and discuss least 2 current resources (other than the Code of Ethics); at least one source must have publication date within the last 10 years to receive credit. 6. Design a specific action plan for dealing with the given situation Rubric The Case Description includes both the client and the therapist; the case is presented from a systemic understanding. The student clearly anticipates the impact of his/her chosen course of action on the client. The student estimates factors in the therapist system which could make “doing the right thing” more difficult. The student estimates the potential impact of seeking consultation, therapy, and/or supervision. The student did not clearly articulate the impact of his/her decision on the course of therapy. Standards AZ- Northcentral University Program Outcomes (2013) School: SMFS Program Outcome: Students will demonstrate an applied knowledge of the AAMFT Code of Ethics (MFT Masters – SLO-3). At least 2 current academic resources (other than the Code) are accurately used. At least one source must be within the last 10 years to receive credit; both ideally should be. Students may, but do not have to, use sources in the suggested annotated bibliography provided. They must apply the source, not simply cite it. Student did not cite two sources in their essay. Student did not use one current source (published within the last 10 years). Standards AZ- Northcentral University Program Outcomes (2013) School: SMFS Program Outcome: Students will demonstrate an applied knowledge of the AAMFT Code of Ethics (MFT Masters – SLO-3). There is a specific action plan for dealing with the given situation. The student must provide a specific plan for seeking personal consultation, supervision or therapy and a plan for continued working with the client under appropriate supervision or consultation. The student must anticipate under what circumstances referral of the client to another therapist, as required in 1.10 and 1.11 of Student did not provide a detailed plan of action for seeking personal consultation, supervision or therapy, or a plan for continued working with the client under appropriate supervision. value: 1.00 value: 0.00 Score/Level the Code, might be indicated. If the student mentions referral, they must cite these sections of the Code. Standards AZ- Northcentral University Program Outcomes (2013) School: SMFS Program Outcome: Students will demonstrate an applied knowledge of the AAMFT Code of Ethics (MFT Masters – SLO-3). Specific sections of the 2015 Code of Ethics are cited. Student cited AAMFT Code of Ethics Standards 1.3; 1.4; 1.5; 1.9; 3.3; 3.4. If student has omitted Standard 3.3, he/she will need to revise the paper. Student has not cited appropriate sections of the AAMFT Code of Ethics. Student omitted Standard 3.3 of the Code of Ethics. The writing reflects correct punctuation, grammar, word usage, and APA style. Student used mostly correct grammar, punctuation, and APA formatting, having less than five errors. Student needs to refine grammar, punctuation, and APA formatting because many errors were evident. Five Assessment Areas/Criteria: Systemic Understanding, Resources, Action Plan, Code of Ethics, Writing Each of the above criteria are scored as ‘Meets Expectations’ (1 point) or ‘Needs Revision’ (0 points). Students must earn a total score of 4 out of 5 (and cite and discuss each of the required standards listed in rubric). Here is the link to the AAMFT cite https://www.aamft.org/Legal_Ethics/Code_of_Ethics.aspxPPP Ethic Essay
Scenario, Instructions, Tips, Rubric and Revision Process
In preparation for this essay, read through the 2015 AAMFT Code of Ethics. A link is
provided.
SCENARIO:
In your personal life, you are in a committed relationship, yet you find yourself noticing that
your client is quite attractive and repeatedly having intimate thoughts about this particular
client. To date you have been successful at pushing it away from your mind when you have
the thought. One day your client discloses to you that s/he thinks about you a lot outside of
sessions and wonders if the two of you may be able to start seeing each other socially.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Based on this scenario, write a 2-3 page essay that addresses each of the following:
1. What does the 2015 AAMFT Code of Ethics include that is relevant to this scenario?
2. What does the recent MFT literature say about ethics in situations like this?
3. What is your personal philosophy of ethics in general?
4. How would you handle this situation? Be sure to think clinically here and list a specific
plan.
TIPS:
Please remember the following when addressing the areas above. Failure to fully address any
one of these areas will result in a requirement for you to resubmit the essay.
1. Adhere to the 2-3 page limit (in essay format, not bulleted or numbered responses).
2. Include properly formatted APA citations, as well as proper spelling & grammar.
3. Use specific sections of the 2015 Code of Ethics and cite them correctly.
4. Discuss the case systemically (not from mere linear perspective), focusing on both the
client and the therapist.
5. Accurately cite and discuss least 2 current resources (other than the Code of Ethics); at
least one source must have publication date within the last 10 years to receive credit.
6. Design a specific action plan for dealing with the given situation.
Although this essay will be evaluated predominantly on content, failure to use proper writing
style, grammar and spelling may result in a requirement that you revise and resubmit the
essay. If you have any questions please email clinical@ncu.edu.
*Please compose your paper in Microsoft Word and upload.*
PPP Ethics Essay Rubric
value: 1.00 value: 0.00 Score/Level
The Case
Description
includes both
the client and
the therapist;
the case is
presented from
a systemic
understanding.
The student clearly
anticipates the impact of
his/her chosen course of
action on the client. The
student estimates factors in
the therapist system which
could make “doing the right
thing” more difficult. The
student estimates the
potential impact of seeking
consultation, therapy, and/or
supervision.
The student did not
clearly articulate the impact
of his/her decision on the
course of therapy.
Standards
AZ- Northcentral University Program Outcomes
(2013)
School: SMFS
Program Outcome:
Students will demonstrate an applied knowledge of the AAMFT
Code of Ethics (MFT Masters – SLO-3).
At least 2
current
academic
resources
(other than the
Code) are
accurately
used.
At least one source must be
within the last 10 years to
receive credit; both ideally
should be. Students may,
but do not have to, use
sources in the suggested
annotated bibliography
provided. They must apply
the source, not simply cite it.
Student did not cite
two sources in their essay.
Student did not use one
current source (published
within the last 10 years).
Standards
AZ- Northcentral University Program Outcomes
(2013)
School: SMFS
Program Outcome:
Students will demonstrate an applied knowledge of the AAMFT
Code of Ethics (MFT Masters – SLO-3).
There is a
specific action
plan for dealing
with the given
situation.
The student must provide a
specific plan for seeking
personal consultation,
supervision or therapy and a
plan for continued working
with the client under
appropriate supervision or
consultation. The student
must anticipate under what
circumstances referral of the
client to another therapist, as
required in 1.10 and 1.11 of
Student did not
provide a detailed plan of
action for seeking personal
consultation, supervision or
therapy, or a plan for
continued working with the
client under appropriate
supervision.
value: 1.00 value: 0.00 Score/Level
the Code, might be
indicated. If the student
mentions referral, they must
cite these sections of the
Code.
Standards
AZ- Northcentral University Program Outcomes
(2013)
School: SMFS
Program Outcome:
Students will demonstrate an applied knowledge of the AAMFT
Code of Ethics (MFT Masters – SLO-3).
Specific
sections of the
2015 Code of
Ethics are
cited.
Student cited AAMFT Code
of Ethics Standards 1.3; 1.4;
1.5; 1.9; 3.3; 3.4. If student
has omitted Standard 3.3,
he/she will need to revise
the paper.
Student has not cited
appropriate sections of the
AAMFT Code of Ethics.
Student omitted Standard
3.3 of the Code of Ethics.
The writing
reflects correct
punctuation,
grammar, word
usage, and
APA style.
Student used mostly correct
grammar, punctuation, and
APA formatting, having less
than five errors.
Student needs to
refine grammar, punctuation,
and APA formatting because
many errors were evident.
Five Assessment Areas/Criteria:
Systemic Understanding, Resources, Action Plan, Code of Ethics, Writing
Each of