• The word-limit on this work is fixed in the template to test your ability to write concisely and to help you concentrate on content and forget style. • The template and case study are both included on Blackboard in the Assessment 2 folder. • The template has guidance notes that you should read. • The case study is self-contained and there is NO expectation that you will do further research on Subway beyond the period of the case study. • There is no expectation you should create a reference list – this is purely self-contained around the case-study. • You can refer to concepts and ideas that we have used on the module – for example “What Subway has done here is an example of a differentiation strategy” but you do not need provide references. • You cannot provide tables or create tables beyond what are in the Case-study – tables and figures should therefore be referred to as listed in the Case-study – for example – on page 4 of the case-study there is a table 1 – you can refer to it as “(see table 1 of case-study)”. • See below for detailed breakdown of how the marks are awarded
Assessment Information/Brief 2019-20
To be used for all types of assessment and provided to students at the start of the module. Information provided should be compatible with the detail contained in the approved module specification although may contain more information for clarity.
Module title Strategic Management
| CRN | 39297 |
| Level | 6 |
| Assessment title | Assessment 2 – Case-study |
| Weighting within module | This assessment is worth 60% of the overall module mark. |
| Submission deadline date and time | Hand in deadline is by 4pm, Monday 18th May 2020 via Turnitin. |
Dr Charles Knight
E: c.g.knight@salford.ac.uk
You should submit your individual essay electronically via the Turnitin pages set up on the module’s Blackboard site – assessment section.
Assessment task details and instructions
———————————————————————
Strategic Management 2019-20: Assessment 2 – Case-study
(This assessment contributes 60% of the overall module mark; learning outcomes assessed – 1,2, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13)
All generic questions about the assessment should be asked on the discussion board provided on blackboard – generic questions sent to email will directed to put these on the message boards.
Using the provided Subway Case Study – answer the following questions using the provided template (File called: “Assessment 2 – Strategic Management – Response Template”) available on Blackboard in the assessment folder (the template has a guidance note explaining how it should be used).
| Question | Word-count | Weighting |
| 1. Identify the main reasons for the success of Subway over the years covered in the case-study.
|
600 | 30% |
| 2. Identify the main reasons for the crisis at Subway over the years covered in the case-study.
|
600 | 30% |
| 3. Recommend strategies that subway could follow to regain market share.
|
600 | 30% |
| Overall: Composition | N/A (included above) | 10% |
Grading indicators (what we are looking for)
| A. Identifying success (30%) | Can you identify why Sub-way was success in the initial period |
| 0-10% | Absence |
| 10-20% | There is a limited attempt to provide a ‘high-level’ thesis/argument but with no supporting context/rationale/purpose and terms or the reader must infer a thesis about why Subway was initially successful. |
| 20-30% | Fails to provide adequate context, rationale, purpose, and terms for their proposed argument/thesis for why Subway was initially successful |
| 30-40% | Provides only a basic context, rationale, purpose, and terms for their proposed argument/thesis for why subway was initially successful |
| 40-50% | Poor statement of context and supporting rationale for proposed argument/thesis for why subway was initially successful. |
| 50-60% | Adequate statement of context and supporting rationale and evidence for proposed argument/thesis for why subway was initially successful. |
| 60-70% | Provides clear context and some supporting rationale for why Subway was initially successful, and ‘success’ metrics are defined and some support for selection of said metrics. |
| 70-80% | Provides a largely consistent and sophisticated supporting rationale for why subway was initially successful, and ‘success’ metrics are defined and there is a direct link to topic knowledge via the selective use of key points from case-study. |
| 80-90% | Provides a sophisticated and strong argument about why Subway was initially successful and how ‘subway’ metrics are defined and were chosen. This is evident in virtually all parts of the response and is almost entirely grounded in the case-study material selected to support answer. |
| 90%-100% | Provides a sophisticated and strong argument about why subway was initially successful and how ‘success’ metrics are defined and were chosen. This is evident in all parts of the response and is entirely grounded in the case-study material selected to support answer. |
| B. Identify the reasons for the crisis (30%) | Can identify why this crisis occurred? |
| 0-10% | Absence |
| 10-20% | There is a limited attempt to provide a ‘high-level’ thesis/argument about the crisis but with no supporting context/rationale/purpose and terms or the reader must infer a thesis. |
| 20-30% | Fails to provide adequate context, rationale, purpose, and terms for their proposed argument/thesis for why the crisis occurred. |
| 30-40% | Provides only a basic context, rationale, purpose, and terms for their proposed argument/thesis for why the crisis occurred. |
| 40-50% | Poor statement of context and supporting rationale for proposed argument/thesis for why the crisis occurred. |
| 50-60% | Adequate statement of context and supporting rationale and evidence for proposed argument/thesis for why the crisis occurred. |
| 60-70% | Provides clear context and some supporting rationale for why the crisis occurred, and ‘failure’ metrics are defined and some support for selection of said metrics. |
| 70-80% | Provides a largely consistent and sophisticated supporting rationale for why the crisis occurred, and there is a direct link to topic knowledge via the selective use of key points from case-study. |
| 80-90% | Provides a sophisticated and strong argument about why the crisis occurred. This is evident in virtually all parts of the response and is almost entirely grounded in the case-study material selected to support answer. |
| 90%-100% | Provides a sophisticated and strong argument about why the crisis. This is evident in all parts of the response and is entirely grounded in the case-study material selected to support answer. |
| C. Recommended strategy (30%) | Do you understand strategy, and can you apply it to subway? |
| 0-10% | Absence |
| 10-20% | Relies on single brief descriptive account of a single concept linked to strategy management or related business models or more generally management theory. No evidence of application of the concept to Subway. |
| 20-30% | Relies on single descriptive account of a strategy management theoretical concept or business models. Very limited evidence application of the chosen theoretical concept to Subway. |
| 30-40% | Relies on descriptive account of a limited range of strategy management theoretical concepts or business models. Limited evidence of attempts at application but not always related to Subway or difficult to see how application applies to Subway. |
| 40-50% | Relies on descriptive account of a limited range of theoretical strategy management concepts or business models. Limited evidence of attempts at application which are mainly applied to Subway. |
| 50-60% | Adequate understanding of the theoretical strategy concepts chosen with reasonable application to Subway. |
| 60-70% | Demonstrates a good understanding of theoretical strategy concepts and illustrate this with clear linkages to Subway as outlined in the case-study. |
| 70-80% | Demonstrates a consistent and sophisticated understanding of theoretical strategy concepts and able to make strong linkages to Subway which is more application rather than description. |
| 80-90% | Demonstrates a consistent and sophisticated understanding of theoretical strategy theory that make strong linkages to implementation to Subway and can offer some novel conclusions about what this means. |
| 90%-100% | Demonstrates sophisticated understanding of theoretical strategy concepts and able to make excellent linkages to organisational practices in Subway and activities within the Subway’s implementation of said concepts. |
| Composition (10% weighting) | Is your response clear and free of error? |
| 0-10% | Incoherent. |
| 10-20% | Largely incoherent. |
| 20-30% | Incoherent in significant parts of response. |
| 30-40% | Poor to adequate writing that may not flow well, be clear, concise, comprehensive, nor does use clear transitions. May not always use proper grammar and spelling. |
| 40-50% | Poor to adequate writing that may not flow well, be clear, concise, comprehensive, nor does uses clear transitions. Uses proper grammar and spelling in most of response. |
| 50-60% | Adequate writing that in parts demonstrates clear, concise, comprehensive, and has some clear transitions. Uses proper grammar and spelling. |
| 60-70% | Good writing that flows well: clear, concise, comprehensive, and uses clear transitions. Uses proper grammar and spelling. |
| 70-80% | Clear, concise, comprehensive, and uses clear transitions. Uses proper grammar and spelling. |
| 80-90% | Clear, concise, comprehensive, sophisticated and uses clear transitions. Uses proper grammar and spelling except for singular minor error. |
| 90%-100% | Clear, concise, comprehensive, sophisticated and uses clear transitions. Uses proper grammar and spelling. Free of error. |
Percentage Mark Level of Performance (based on mark awarded):
| 90-100 | Outstanding |
| 80-89 | Excellent |
| 70-79 | Very Good |
| 60-69 | Good |
| 50-59 | Fair |
| 40-49 | Adequate |
| 30-39 | Unsatisfactory |
| 20-29 | Poor |
| 10-19 | Very Poor |
| 0-9 | Extremely Poor |
Also refer to the detailed Level 6 grade descriptors available on the module’s Blackboard.
Assessed intended learning outcomes
On successful completion of this module, you will be able to:
On successful completion the student will be able to:
On completion the student will have had the opportunity to:
On completion of the module, the student will have had the opportunity to/will be able to:
Your assessment should be a total word count of 1800 – this word limit as indicated in the details above. Each question of the essay is enforced by the template and excludes any relevant tables, charts, diagrams provided in the appendix and bibliography.
Formative assessment includes discussion of academic and professional journal articles, class discussion in seminars, clarification of topics, presentations and higher order questions. Formative feedback will be provided during the teaching sessions, and, where appropriate, via the Blackboard announcements. This will enable students to develop their knowledge and understanding of materials covered in the module.
Summative assessments include:
The summative marks and overall feedback will be provided using the assessment rubric in line with the grading guidance above, the L6 grade descriptors and the university guidelines and time frame at 5pm on 12 June 2020 via Turnitin/ Blackboard. Regular and consistent guidance for the assessment will be provided throughout to students in virtual seminars, study workshops and discussion boards.
You can obtain support for this assessment by attending briefing lectures, and tutorials are aimed at helping different tasks of the assessments. Some relevant announcements will be made via the Blackboard as well to provide support and reminders for timely submissions. The relevant staff can be contacted via email, though it is important given the nature of the assessment that students attend the lectures and tutorials to enable more personalised support. The tutors will have virtual office hours that can be used -prior email to tutors to arrange appointments help in giving suitable time due to large student cohort. These office hours are advertised on the module’s Blackboard. It is vitally important that the students attend the assessment briefing sessions in lectures and also the ongoing support throughout tutorials from week 1 onwards during the semester 2.
askUS
The University offers a range of support services for students through askUS.
Students are expected to learn and demonstrate skills associated with good academic conduct (academic integrity). Good academic conduct includes the use of clear and correct referencing of source materials. Here is a link to where you can find out more about the skills which students require http://www.salford.ac.uk/skills–for–learning.
Academic Misconduct is an action which may give you an unfair advantage in your academic work. This includes plagiarism, asking someone else to write your assessment for you or taking notes into an exam. The University takes all forms of academic misconduct seriously. You can find out how to avoid academic misconduct here https://www.salford.ac.uk/skills–forlearning.
Please see the assessment information and the relevant company information attached herewith for the tasks, word count, and submission details.
If personal mitigating circumstances may have affected your ability to complete this assessment, you can find more information about personal mitigating circumstances procedure here.
If you have any concerns about your studies, contact the Student Progression Administrator.
Please refer to the Level 6 Grade Descriptors available on the module’s Blackboard. The briefing sessions for the assessment will take place during the module and will outline the specific details of each task. The understanding of concepts, their practical application, and use of relevant analysis and information will be assessed in view of the Level 6 grade descriptors.
You should look at the assessment criteria to find out what we are specifically looking at during the assessment.
Your assessment is not eligible for in year retrieval.
If you fail your assessment, and are eligible for reassessment, you will be contacted at that point to outline the process the University will follow during the current crisis as this may be different from normal process. For students with accepted personal mitigating circumstances, this will be your replacement assessment attempt. Students should be aware that there is no late submission period at reassessment (this includes those students who have an accepted PMC request from a previous attempt).
Why Work with Us
Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers
We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.
Professional and Experienced Academic Writers
We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.
Free Unlimited Revisions
If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.
Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee
All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.
Original & Confidential
We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.
24/7 Customer Support
Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.
Try it now!
How it works?
Follow these simple steps to get your paper done
Place your order
Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.
Proceed with the payment
Choose the payment system that suits you most.
Receive the final file
Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.
Our Services
No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.
Essays
No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.
Admissions
Admission Essays & Business Writing Help
An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.
Reviews
Editing Support
Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.
Reviews
Revision Support
If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.