The Impeachment of Donald Trump Assignment | Online Assignment

Identify a case that has been completed or settled, similar to the ones to be explored in this class, that relates to public sector ethics, integrity, and accountability and for which you can obtain relevant documents, supplemented by appropriate literature. THE CASE I CHOSE WAS THE IMPEACHMENT OF DONALD TRUMP. Your paper should include: **Executive Summary** 2 pages max An overview of the paper in essay format • Hypothesis – what is the central issue on the case and why is this important? What is the problem – first line: a simple clear statement of the problem or issue Why is this important? What are the expected outcomes? No more than half a page • Literature Review – statement of the relevant facts o A description of the case, including significant events, participants, damages or consequences to the government or organization and or individuals, statutes or codes of ethics, and dates and information that are relevant to your analysis. Just the facts, no analysis, no opinions. You are telling a story related to the hypothesis. What are the relevant facts? What are the strengths of those facts – what is present that helps explain the hypothesis What are the weaknesses – what is missing that would help understand the hypothesis (if none don’t force this) o All facts and figures must be cited with a reference section at the end of the paper • Analysis of the case About 1 page The analysis determines whether or not the hypotheses are sustained. Opinions go in the discussion. What facts prove the hypothesis? What facts disprove the hypothesis? How do we relate the facts and the strengths and weaknesses to the expected outcomes? Stop telling the story and start thinking o Ethics Perspective, Accountability Perspective – Analysis  Economics, Consequences and Outcomes •Discussion 1 page or less What are your thoughts on the outcomes? Here is where you put your opinions and observations – Policy Recommendations About 1 page Examine 2 or 3 recommendations, compare them briefly and justify the best one. You cannot come up with a recommendation out of thin air that has nothing to do with the analysis. They must be related. Also, recommendations must be feasible (economically, politically and logistically). You cannot prose things that are impossible to achieve or too expensive to pay for Discussion and recommendations are based on the analysis. What can you specifically recommend to solve or mitigate the problem? Don’t use “more training needed” or “more research need” When preparing the case, you must propose at least three remedial policy options: 1. Compare their relative worth based on political, administrative, feasibility, financial, equity and effectiveness factors 2. Choose the best option and explain your choice. Paper format, main section headers (YOU MUST USE THESE): • Hypothesis (statement of the problem) • Literature Review (what are the main themes found in the literature) • Analysis (of the case facts – how the literature relates to the hypothesis) • Discussion (your essay on what the case means) • Policy Recommendations (what can be done to prevent the problem) Your paper must be in (APA format) should clearly describe and analyze your research, demonstrate your understanding of the issues and course concepts, and use of appropriate literature. If you quote any written material, be sure that the quote is accurate, use quotation marks, and properly attribute the quotation to the author and source. Similarly, if you refer to a concept or if you paraphrase an author, be sure to attribute the source. Your case description and analysis should not exceed 10 pages, exclusive of any appendices and the reference page, and must be double-spaced, using 12-point type and one-inch margins. Papers not in APA format will not be accepted.