The University of Tennessee Green Software Engineering Project green software engineering Great. I am attaching the template we will use when you write y

The University of Tennessee Green Software Engineering Project green software engineering

Great.

I am attaching the template we will use when you write your project report.

I am putting below a list of references.

.

=======================================================================

REFERENCES

Energy-aware Software Engineering

G. PINTO and F CASTOR (2017): Energy Efficiency: A New Concern for Application Software Developers, COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, DECEMBER 2017 | VOL. 60 | NO. 12.

K. Eder and J. P. Gallagher (2017): Energy-Aware Software Engineering, Chapter in Book, Intech, 2017.

A. Hindle (2016): Green Software Engineering: The Curse of Methodology, IEEE 23rd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering, 2016.

S. GEORGIOU et al. (2019): Software Development Lifecycle for Energy Efficiency: Techniques and Tools, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 52, No. 4, Article 81, August 2019.

J. Singh et al. (2015): Impact of Developer Choices on Energy Consumption of Software on Servers, Procedia Computer Science 62 ( 2015 ) 385 – 394

M.A. Beghoura et al. (2017): Green software requirements and measurement: random decision forests-based software energy consumption profiling, Requirements Eng (2017) 22:27–40

A. Banerjee et al. (2017): Future of Mobile Software for Smartphones and Drones: Energy and Performance, 2017 IEEE/ACM 4th International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MOBILESoft)

G Procaccianti et al. (2016): Empirical evaluation of two best practices for energy-efficient software development, The Journal of Systems and Software 117 (2016) 185–198

=====================================================================================

Ontologies and Metamodeling

B. Henderson-Sellers (2011): Bridging metamodels and ontologies in software engineering, The Journal of Systems and Software 84 (2011) 301–313

Edgar Serna M. et al. (2014): Ontology for knowledge management in software maintenance, International Journal of Information Management, Volume 34, Issue 5, October 2014, Pages 704-710.

L. Merino et al. (2019): VISON: An Ontology-Based Approach for Software Visualization Tool Discoverability, In VISSOFT’19: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Working Conference on Software Visualization, IEEE, 2019.

B. Henderson-Sellers et al. (2014): An ontology for ISO software engineering standards, Computer Standards & Interfaces 36 (2014) 563–576.

Z. Havlice et al. (2009): Knowledge in Software Life Cycle, 7th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics, 2009.

===================================================================== Master Project Title
Student Full Name
Student ID
Email Address
Advisor(s)
Advisor Full Name
[First/Second Semester]
[Date Hijri dd/mm/yyyy]
[Date Gregoriandd/mm/yyyy]
ABSTRACT
The abstract is a brief summary of your project proposal, and should be no longer than 200
words.
KEYWORDS
This section is a list of the more appropriate words or expressions (up to twelve), separated by
commas that you would use in a search engine to find a project proposal identical to yours.
Your proposal title can be useful in identifying keywords.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (optional)
(Sample Wording)
I would like to thank my committee chair, Dr. Smith, and my committee members, Dr. Jones,
Dr. Morton, Dr. Anderson, and Professor Benner, for their guidance and support throughout
the course of this research.
Table of Contents
Chapter 1………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9
Chapter 2…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 11
Chapter 3…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 12
Chapter 4…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 13
Chapter 5…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 14
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
(Entries are listed alphabetically)
CA
CS
CVC
ITI
MMPI
NTIS
RT
STM
conditioned avoidance
conditioned stimulus
consonant-vowel-consonant
intertribal interval
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
National Technical Information Service
reaction time
short-term memory
LIST OF SYMBOLS (optional)
λ
Lambda indicates usually an eigenvalue in linear algebra
ϕ
An angle
π
A mathematical constant whose value is the ratio of any circle’s circumference to
its diameter
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1 Photo of University…………………………………………………………………………….. 17
Figure 1.2 Photo of University…………………………………………………………………………….. 22
Figure 1.3 Photo of University…………………………………………………………………………….. 24
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1 (Insert Table Name)…………………………………………………………………………….28
Table 3.2 (Insert Table Name)…………………………………………………………………………….31
Table 3.3 (Insert Table Name)…………………………………………………………………………….35
Chapter 1
Introduction
[NOTE: The master project report and thesis are almost identical when comes to writing.
However, there is a difference in the way master proposal and thesis is conducted and there is
a difference in expectations from the two. This report will only highlight the requirements of
master project writing.
The master project can be a work on developing an innovative system/application or it can be
research-oriented as well. Even if it is a development-oriented work, some sort of innovation
and novelty must be there, although that may not be significant compared to thesis.
The exact internal structure of the chapter and subsections inside the chapters will be
determined by the supervisor and the student.
The length of the total report should not exceed 100 pages]
1.1 Problem Definition
1.2 Project Objectives
1.3 Relevance to the Department
1.4 Outcomes and Deliverables
Chapter 2
Background and Related Works
[NOTE: The student must provide necessary background tools, techniques, concepts that are
needed to understand the solution. Besides, a fair number of related literature must be covered
and a summary of these must be presented here. Compared to thesis, the list of related
literature may be fewer, for example eight/ten related literature would be okay]
2.1
Background
2.2
Related Work
Chapter 3
Proposed System
[NOTE: This chapter should gradually state what the system is all about, what methodology is
followed, what complexity is addressed, proposed conceptual architecture, architecture
description, detail design, algorithms, etc. When talking about detail design, the student must
not provide trivial detail, should not go through use case description one by one, and should
not present the analysis of each and every use case as is done in the typical system design.
Rather, it will be recommended to provide important aspects, core modules, novel algorithms,
and innovative approaches. The student can use Appendix to push some information at the end
of the report if needed]
3.1
Overview
3.2
Conceptual Architecture
….
….
Chapter 4
Implementation and Results
[NOTE: The implementation platform, tools and techniques applied can be highlighted here.
Besides, some evaluation results must be reported to prove that the objectives of the project
has been met ]
4.1
Implementation
4.2
Results
….
….
Chapter 5
Conclusions and Future Work
[NOTE: Summarize what has been presented and what are left/ what else can be done as a
future work. ]
REFERENCES
J. Author, “Title of the conference paper,” in Name of the Conference Proceedings,Location,
Mon. Year.
A. Wiles and I. Daubechies, “Title of the journal paper,” Name of the Journal, vol.vol., no.
iss., p. page, Mon. Year.
J. Smith, P. Fermat, and C. Maxwell, Book Title, 3rd ed. Location: Publisher Name,Year.
A. Name, “Thesis/dissertation title,” Ph.D. dissertation, School Name, Year.
APPENDICES
Appendix A Title
Detailed experimental procedures, data tables, computer programs, etc. may be placed in
appendices. This may be particularly appropriate if the dissertation orthesis includes several
published papers.
Appendix B Title
Detailed experimental procedures, data tables, computer programs, etc. may be placed in
appendices. This may be particularly appropriate if the dissertation orthesis includes several
published papers.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment