North Carolina A & T State University Hate Crimes against Black Race Research Research Proposal Rubric double space, APA, 12 times new roman, 4 pages incl

North Carolina A & T State University Hate Crimes against Black Race Research Research Proposal Rubric

double space, APA, 12 times new roman, 4 pages including reference excluding title page

Poor Less than 29

Minimal 30-34

Adequate 35-39

Good 40-44

Excellent 45-50

Introduction-Literature Review

Fails to provide empirical research supporting the topic.Synthesis and organization is based on limited information. There is little to poor link between the literature and the hypotheses or question.

Minimal review of the literature and little mention of empirical sources.Poor synthesis and organization of the literature, which minimally links it to the hypotheses or question.

Adequate review of the literature and empirical sources.Good synthesis and organization of the literature, which is clearly linked to the hypothesis or question.

Good review of relevant and empirical sources. Good synthesis and organization of literature that is clearly linked to hypothesis or question.

Insightful review of relevant and empirical sources, citing important works in the field. Exemplary synthesis and organization of literature that is clearly linked to hypothesis or question.

Introduction Hypothesis Statement or question

Fails to provide adequate statement of research question or hypothesis.

Poor statement of research question or hypothesis.

Adequate statement of research question or hypothesis.

Clear statement of research question or hypothesis.

Testable research question or hypothesis clearly stated.

Method

Fails to provide statement of research design, sample instruments, and/or procedures. No discussion of issues of internal validity, or reliability & validity or measures.

Provides poor statement of research design, sample, instruments, and procedures with large degree of vagueness. Vague discussion of some issues of internal validity, or reliability & validity of measures.

Provides adequate statement of research design, sample, instruments, and procedures with some degree of vagueness. Some discussion of issues of internal validity, or reliability & validity of measures.

Provides adequate statement of research design, sample, instruments, and procedures with some degree of vagueness. Some discussion ofissues of internal validity, or reliability & validity of measures

Provides clear and descriptive statement of research design, sample, instruments, and procedures (recipe style) Insightful discussion ofissues of internal validity, or reliability & validity of measures

Analysis/Results

Analysis overview is inadequate to research question.

Analysis overview is vaguely described.

Appropriate and adequate analysis overview.

Appropriate and good analysis overview, with some detail regarding data entry & storage.

Excellent, appropriate and advanced analysis overview, with attention to issue of data entry and storage.

Discussion

Fails to provide adequate outline of limitations of study or ethical considerations.

Poor outline of some limitations of study or ethical considerations.

Adequate outline of some limitations of study or ethical considerations.

Good outline of some limitations of study or ethical considerations.

Sophisticated outline of limitations of study or ethical considerations.

APA style and Format

Little or no conformation to APA format/style

Many substantial consistent APA errors

Some minor consistent APA errors

Few APA errors, none consistent

Exemplary APA format/style throughout