Cars in A Parking Lot Hypothesis Testing Discussion For your initial post, choose one of the following two prompts to respond to. Use the discussion topic

Cars in A Parking Lot Hypothesis Testing Discussion For your initial post, choose one of the following two prompts to respond to. Use the discussion topic as a place to ask questions, speculate about answers, and share insights. Be sure to embed and cite your references for any supporting images.

Write a hypothesis test problem using one of the two options below. For whichever option you choose, gather appropriate data and post your problem (without a solution) in the discussion topic. You may use the same data that you gathered in your Module Three Discussion Topic post. Allow time for your classmates to post their solutions, and then respond to your own post with a solution for others to check their work.

Option 1:

Think about a population mean that you may be interested in and propose a hypothesis test problem for this parameter. Gather appropriate data and post your problem, Later, respond to your own post with your own solution.

For example, you may believe that the population mean number of times that adults go out for dinner each week is less than 1.5. Your data could be that you spoke with 7 people and found that they went out 2, 0, 1, 5, 0, 2, and 3 times last week. You then would choose to test this hypothesis at the .05 (or another) significance level. Assume a random sample.

Option 2:

Think about a population proportion that you may be interested in and propose a hypothesis test problem for this parameter. Gather appropriate data and post your problem. Later, respond to your own post with your own solution.

For example, you may believe that the population proportion of adults in the US who own SUVs is 0.25. Your data could be that you surveyed people leaving work at the end of the day and found that 13 out of 50 owned an SUV. Test this hypothesis at the .05 (or another) significance level. Assume a random sample.

For your response to a classmate (two responses are required, one in each option), solve your classmate’s hypothesis test problem using a significance level not previously used for that specific classmate’s problem. Include the null and alternative hypothesis, alpha value, p-value, and a conclusion. Make sure that you use appropriate terminology, specify whether you are using the classical method or the p-value method, and fully explain your solution.

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document attached. Discussion Rubric: Undergraduate
Your active participation in the discussion forums is essential to your overall success this term. Discussion questions are designed to help you make meaningful
connections between the course content and the larger concepts and goals of the course. These discussions offer you the opportunity to express your own
thoughts, ask questions for clarification, and gain insight from your classmates’ responses and instructor’s guidance.
Requirements for Discussion Board Assignments
Students are required to post one initial post and to follow up with at least two response posts for each discussion board assignment.
For your initial post (1), you must do the following:
? Compose a post of one to two paragraphs.
? In Module One, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time.
? In Modules Two through Eight, complete the initial post by Thursday at
11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
? Take into consideration material such as course content and other
discussion boards from the current module and previous modules, when
appropriate (make sure you are using proper citation methods for your
discipline when referencing scholarly or popular resources).
For your response posts (2), you must do the following:
? Reply to at least two different classmates outside of your own initial
post thread.
? In Module One, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59
p.m. Eastern Time.
? In Modules Two through Eight, complete the two response posts by
Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
? Demonstrate more depth and thought than simply stating that “I agree”
or “You are wrong.” Guidance is provided for you in each discussion
prompt.
Rubric
Critical Elements
Comprehension
Exemplary
Develops an initial post with an
organized, clear point of view or
idea using rich and significant detail
(100%)
Timeliness
Engagement
Writing
(Mechanics)
Provides relevant and meaningful
response posts with clarifying
explanation and detail (100%)
Writes posts that are easily
understood, clear, and concise
using proper citation methods
where applicable with no errors in
citations (100%)
Proficient
Develops an initial post with a
point of view or idea using
adequate organization and
detail (85%)
Submits initial post on time
(100%)
Provides relevant response
posts with some explanation
and detail (85%)
Writes posts that are easily
understood using proper
citation methods where
applicable with few errors in
citations (85%)
Needs Improvement
Develops an initial post with a
point of view or idea but with
some gaps in organization and
detail (55%)
Submits initial post one day late
(55%)
Provides somewhat relevant
response posts with some
explanation and detail (55%)
Writes posts that are
understandable using proper
citation methods where
applicable with a number of
errors in citations (55%)
Not Evident
Does not develop an initial post
with an organized point of view
or idea (0%)
Value
40
Submits initial post two or more
days late (0%)
Provides response posts that
are generic with little
explanation or detail (0%)
Writes posts that others are not
able to understand and does
not use proper citation
methods where applicable (0%)
10
Total
30
20
100%

Purchase answer to see full
attachment