Rewrite essay for me | Quick Homework Help

I don’t understand this Philosophy question and need help to study.

Can some rewrite this essay for me I want EVERY SINGlE WORD MUST BE DIFFERENT!! NO SENTENCES CAN BE THIS SAME!!

THERE MUST BE NO PLAGIARISM!1

Here is the essay!!

1.Socrates claims that “knowledge and belief are not the same”, and that, however, “both those who have learned and those who believe have been persuaded” (454 d-e). The difference in belief and knowledge is that there can be false beliefs. There is not a possibility that there is such a thing as false knowledge. Knowledge is something that has been proven and involves true meaning. Beliefs can simply be a perception of an individual’s reality. Gorgias does agree with Socrates that the kind of conviction about the right and wrong in a courtroom can be persuasive but that does not include whether the information given is right or wrong. Although he is in agreement with Socrates, he still maintains the belief that oration can convince a crowd on any subject, even if the person speaking is not an expert in the subject, as long as they are able to persuade well. Socrates is trying to get Gorgias to admit that an individual who is not skilled in the subject that they are speaking about is more likely to persuade a crowd because they are able to create the impression of good and make it seem desirable.

2. Gorgias states that “… I suppose that if he does not possess this knowledge, he can learn these things from me” (460a). In this statement, he is contradicting himself because he is saying that the person who has taught their students a specific subject is not responsible for the unjust uses by the students. This is contradicting because he had previously stated that anyone who is becoming an orator should know the difference between just and unjust beforehand.

3. Polus believes that orators are the individuals who have the ultimate power in the city that they live in and that the power in which they have is good for for them. Socrates disagrees with that statement, saying that orators are not capable of have such power. He compares orators and tyrants, stating that they both only do what is best for themselves because of the good results that they think will happen. Socrates then says that an individual only become powerful if the results that they receive are good. Most of the time, they are unsuccessful with good results and this becomes a sign of weakness. Polus then states that an individual who does what they want has to try to avoid the bad results, which can include punishments. By doing so, they can achieve an advantage from their actions and have good results for themselves. Socrates disagrees because he feels that if an individual has done an unjust actions, by receiving a punishment, this will help them improve themselves. When it comes to happiness, Polus believes that it is completely based on the individual’s attitude toward concepts. Socrates agrees with him but then Vigil 2 disagrees because in order to be happy, a person’s soul must be just because that is, in the end, what seems to be the most beneficial to that person

4. Callicles believes that once an individual enters adulthood, they should not continue to search for the truth through philosophy. He considers it to be childish because it provides and encourages the lessening need to be interested in the political world. It also weakens an individual’s power and makes them lesser of a man. An individual needs power in order to achieve one’s desires and pleasures from which they will be satisfied. Rhetoric is something that will allow that person to achieve all those things in order to be the best they can be.