SS 350 Herzing University Wk 2 Life Cycle of a Social Problem Discussion Unit 2 Assessment – Life Cycle of a Social Problem Submit Assignment Due Jul 19

SS 350 Herzing University Wk 2 Life Cycle of a Social Problem Discussion Unit 2 Assessment – Life Cycle of a Social Problem

Submit Assignment

Due Jul 19 by 11:59pm
Points 85
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Instructions

In Unit 1, you identified recent technological advancements that have impacted human beings.

In this unit’s discussion post, you researched a social problem related to a recent technological advancement.

Next, you are to write a brief outline (see template below for guidance) analyzing the life cycle of that social problem. The life cycle of social problems includes the following stages:

Emergence and claims-making
Legitimacy
Renewed claims making
Development of alternative strategies

Make sure to support each point with facts derived from valid outside sources selected with the methods covered in this week’s discussion post. Please submit your writing assignment in an outline format (see example attached to this prompt). Be sure to cite all sources using APA formatting style (Links to an external site.).

The Library of Congress (Links to an external site.) has established an index of social issues in the United States. Please reach out to the instructor with any questions about this assignment.

Attached Files

Unit 2 Essay Outline Structure

Estimated time to complete: 3 to 4 hours

References

Library of Congress (n.d.). Table of contents for social issues in America. Retrieved from http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0516/20050187…

Purdue Online Writing Lab (n.d.). APA formatting and style guide. Retrieved from https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/a…

Rubric

SS350 Unit 2 Assessment – Life Cycle of a Social Problem

SS350 Unit 2 Assessment – Life Cycle of a Social Problem

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentSS350 -CO2

25.0 pts

Level 5

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.

23.0 pts

Level 4

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.

21.0 pts

Level 3

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.

19.0 pts

Level 2

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.

16.0 pts

Level 1

Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P

25.0 pts

Level 5

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

23.0 pts

Level 4

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

21.0 pts

Level 3

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

19.0 pts

Level 2

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

16.0 pts

Level 1

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology

17.0 pts

Level 5

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.

15.0 pts

Level 4

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.

14.0 pts

Level 3

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.

12.0 pts

Level 2

Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.

11.0 pts

Level 1

Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.

17.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

13.0 pts

Level 5

The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

11.5 pts

Level 4

The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

10.0 pts

Level 3

The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication

9.0 pts

Level 2

The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

7.0 pts

Level 1

The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

13.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

5.0 pts

Level 5

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.

4.0 pts

Level 4

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

3.0 pts

Level 3

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.

2.0 pts

Level 2

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.

1.0 pts

Level 1

The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements

0.0 pts

Level 0

There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 85.0

PreviousNext

Submission
Not Submitted!

Submission Details

(85 pts possible)

Graded Anonymously: no

Comments: